From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Fri Jan 24 22:25:29 2020 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 14:25:29 -0800 Subject: CFV: Dissolve the Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project Message-ID: <1653b44d-1781-83e4-ea9d-5cfef90554b2@oracle.com> According to section 6 of the bylaws [1], the Committers of a Project may decide, by Lazy Consensus, to request that a Project should be dissolved. When a Project is dissolved its materials are archived. A dissolved Project may be re-created by being re-proposed. The work that was done in this Project has been integrated into the mainline JDK project, and this mailing list has been inactive since November 2016, except for a suggestion that it should be archived, in May 2019. I therefore propose that the Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project [2] should be dissolved. Votes are due by 2pm PDT, 7th February 2020 Only current Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project Committers [3] are eligible to vote. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. -- Jon [1] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#_6 [2] https://openjdk.java.net/projects/anno-pipeline [3] https://openjdk.java.net/census#anno-pipeline From maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com Sat Jan 25 00:02:58 2020 From: maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com (Maurizio Cimadamore) Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 00:02:58 +0000 Subject: CFV: Dissolve the Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project In-Reply-To: <1653b44d-1781-83e4-ea9d-5cfef90554b2@oracle.com> References: <1653b44d-1781-83e4-ea9d-5cfef90554b2@oracle.com> Message-ID: Vote: yes Maurizio On 24/01/2020 22:25, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > According to section 6 of the bylaws [1], the Committers of a Project may > decide, by Lazy Consensus, to request that a Project should be > dissolved. When a Project is dissolved its materials are archived. A > dissolved Project may be re-created by being re-proposed. > > The work that was done in this Project has been integrated into the > mainline JDK project, and this mailing list has been inactive since > November 2016, except for a suggestion that it should be archived, > in May 2019. > > I therefore propose that the Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project [2] > should be dissolved. > > Votes are due by 2pm PDT, 7th February 2020 > > Only current Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project Committers [3] are > eligible to vote. > > Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. > > -- Jon > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#_6 > [2] https://openjdk.java.net/projects/anno-pipeline > [3] https://openjdk.java.net/census#anno-pipeline >