<AWT Dev> [PATCH] Cleanup AWT peer interfaces

[Andrei V. Dmitriev]

Hi,

I found that reasonable since the very first time evaluated the cacio 
code. Though this patch probably requires more time to get reviewed...

Thanks,
   Andrei

Roman Kennke wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
> 
>>> Yeah sure. I reviewed all the existing implementations and they should
>>> not break, but a lot of stuff could be removed.
>> Just appeared to public access:
>> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6749920
> 
> Cool. BTW, I have another patch for the peer interfaces in the Cacio
> repo, that one adds API docs to all the interfaces. Nothing serious,
> only roughly what it does (this might be obvious by the method names
> anyway) and pointers to where it is used in AWT (I found this important
> for implementing the peers, so that people can look up the nitty gritty
> details themselves). In the projects I was involved in so far we had
> policies to separate code changes from doc and formatting changes, but I
> don't know how this is handled in OpenJDK. Maybe we want to push these
> together. Find this doc patch attached (this follows up on the
> cleanpeers patch, will not apply on clean OpenJDK!)
> 
> Cheers, Roman
> 
>