<AWT Dev> Patch feedback?
Denis S. Fokin
Denis.Fokin at Sun.COM
Mon Feb 8 09:38:00 PST 2010
Hi Damjan,
Thank you for the samples.
I tried to execute them.
I executed Drop and it did not work for me.
As I understand the class requires an URI as a parameter to store a
dropped file in the location.
I tired to pass '.' and 'file://....' as parameters but the transfered
file did not appear at the specified locations.
Form the other hand, the drop of a file from ubuntu GNOME desktop was
refused (I am not sure whether it is a nautilus window) and from ubuntu
GNOME nautilus window the drop was accepted (but as I mentioned above
the file was not transfered).
More details from you about the expected behavior would be appreciated )
As for the BasicDnD.java I either did not catch the scenario.
What should be dragged from the test? An item from the JTree?
Thank you,
Denis.
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Denis S. Fokin <Denis.Fokin at sun.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Damjan,
>>
>
> Hi Denis
>
>
>> Could you provide more details...
>>
>>
>>> 8. Needs jtreg tests.
>>>
>> It would be great to look at a sample application, that you used to write
>> your prototype :-)
>> Could you attach it?
>>
>
> Attached. One is to test drops, the other drags. They're quite hacked :-)
>
>
>>> It's been tested with Nautilus and File Roller on Linux,
>>> Windows Explorer and Windows Mail on Windows. All work.
>>>
>> Could you give us more details about scenarios that you have used for the
>> testing?
>>
>
> Drag file from Java, drop to Nautilus
> Drag file from an archive (eg. ZIP file) opened in File Roller, drop to Java
> Drag file from Java, drop to Windows Explorer
> Drag email or attachment from Windows Mail, drop to Java
> And finally: drag from Java, drop to Java
>
> All tests need the patch applied to compile and run.
>
>
>> Thank you,
>> Denis.
>>
>
> Thank you
> Damjan
>
>
>> Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Can I please get some feedback and maybe a sponsor for
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100124
>>>
>>> I've been waiting for the past 6 weeks. I need to at least know
>>> whether it's worth continuing work on this patch.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Damjan
>>>
>>
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list