<AWT Dev> Review: Remove private API from graphics code
Scott Kovatch
scott.kovatch at oracle.com
Fri Aug 31 11:57:39 PDT 2012
On Aug 31, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Phil Race <philip.race at oracle.com> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> These files were added by Bino to support printing. Quartz isn't used
> except for printing in JDK 7, so as I understand it, testing on-screen in
> Java2Demo should not exercise this code. I'm surprised that you saw
> it being exercised. Did you do any printing testing ?
I tried printing from the 2d demo, and now I'm not so sure about the changes. I printed one image and it was inverted. :-\
> The matrix inversion seems unlikely to be applied to any non-invertible
> matrices, so that's fine, but I wonder if you have lost precision here
> due to floating point inaccuracies ?
I have to admit that I didn't go that deep into the code, since the main purpose of the changes were to get rid of the private API so we could submit something to the OS X app store.
> If you originally had a simple scale or identity, rotated it, and then
> applied the inverse to unrotate it, do you really end up with exactly
> the same results. The more you do this the more inaccuracies creep in,
> which may be part of the reason for the original approach.
> I find it a little hard to believe that there isn't a direct public way to
> restore a transform.
I was surprised by that, too, but for what it's worth CGContextSave/RestoreGState save and restore the current transform. I didn't dig deeply enough to see if they could/should be used instead.
> The changes for mountain lion are safe for snow leopard I presume?
> I believe the builds still happen on snow leopard.
I would think so, yes. I'm replacing private API with long-available public API. The core JDK builds on Lion due to the need for APIs that arrived in 10.7.3.
> Also this should have been sent to 2d-dev, not awt-dev.
> These files, APIs, and printing are all 2D, not awt.
Okay. I didn't realize Quartz was only being used in printing, though in retrospect that makes sense now. I see you moved the bug already.
-- Scott K.
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list