<AWT Dev> [7u6] Please review my fix for 7184951: [macosx] Exception at java.awt.datatransfer on headless mode (only in GUI session)
Alexander Zuev
alexander.zuev at oracle.com
Mon Jul 23 03:53:09 PDT 2012
Artem,
these native methods should not be called according to the logic of
the class so we shouldn't safeguard them.
I will create the sub-cr against the jdk8.
WBR,
Alex
On 7/23/12 14:41, Artem Ananiev wrote:
> Hi, Alex,
>
> (cross-posting to awt-dev)
>
> I see several other native methods in CDataTransferer, e.g.
> formatForIndex(). Could you confirm, they cannot be called in the
> headless mode, so there is no need to protect them with headless
> check, please?
>
> Could you also file a SubCR against JDK8 with the idea we discussed
> offline: create a new CHeadlessDataTransferer class to use in the
> headless mode instead of CDataTransferer + headless checks, please?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Artem
>
> On 7/23/2012 1:09 PM, Alexander Zuev wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please review my fix 7184951: [macosx] Exception at
>> java.awt.datatransfer on headless mode (only in GUI session)
>> CR description can be found here:
>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7184951
>>
>> Webrev with the proposed change can be seen here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kizune/7184951/webrev.00
>>
>> The problem here lays somewhere deep in the Toolkit life cycle on
>> Mac OS X - at the time we initialize datatransfer the
>> Toolgit.getDefaultToolkit() returns an LWCToolkit instance and later
>> when we trying to use it it returns HeadlessToolkit. That's definitely
>> wrong but at this stage it's too risky to fiddle with the life cycle
>> itself so this is a hotfix that deals with the fallout of the actual
>> error. The fix for jdk8 should be different.
>>
>> With best regards,
>> Alex
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list