<AWT Dev> <Swing Dev> Request for review: 7155298 : Editable TextArea blocks GUI application from exit

[Anthony Petrov]

Hi Sean,

>   92             worker = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(System.getProperty("java.home")+"/bin/java TestDispose workprocess");

This won't work on MS Windows because the path separator character is 
different there.

Actually, I don't understand why you need this Runtime stuff in the 
first place. If test JVM doesn't terminate, the test will fail. So why 
not create a frame and a text field right in the main(), then call 
dispose() and return from main()? Since the timer thread will still be 
running, the test's JVM won't exit, and the test will fail by timeout 
eventually. Will this testing scenario work?

--
best regards,
Anthony

On 03/23/12 10:49, Sean Chou wrote:
>
> I modified the testcase according to Anthony Petrov's
> suggestion(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-March/002389.html)
> .
> The new webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhouyx/7155298/webrev.02/
>
> However, the timeout action in jtreg only checks the main method, but
> the timeout is caused by timer thread .
> So, I started an other process to run the testcase and the main testcase
> waitFor that process to stop. In order to kill the process started by
> the testcase, I added a ShutdownHook to the runtime of main testcase.
> And added /othervm action to testcase .
>
> It seems the testcase is a little over complex, is there any other
> method to make the testcase simpler ?
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Oleg Sukhodolsky <son.two at gmail.com
> <mailto:son.two at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Anton V. Tarasov
>     <anton.tarasov at oracle.com <mailto:anton.tarasov at oracle.com>> wrote:
>      > On 3/22/12 6:15 PM, Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote:
>      >>
>      >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Anton V. Tarasov
>      >> <anton.tarasov at oracle.com <mailto:anton.tarasov at oracle.com>>  wrote:
>      >>>
>      >>> On 22.03.2012 14:37, Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote:
>      >>>>
>      >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Anton V. Tarasov
>      >>>> <anton.tarasov at oracle.com <mailto:anton.tarasov at oracle.com>>
>       wrote:
>      >>>>>
>      >>>>> On 22.03.2012 12:47, Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote:
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Sean
>     Chou<zhouyx at linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:zhouyx at linux.vnet.ibm.com>>
>      >>>>>>  wrote:
>      >>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>> Hi Oleg,
>      >>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>     Seem there are misunderstanding .
>      >>>>>>>     DefaultCaret can receive FocusLostEvent when another
>     control get
>      >>>>>>> focused. But it
>      >>>>>>> doesn't receive FocusLostEvent when disposing.
>      >>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>     The reason is XTextAreaPeer doesn't receive
>     FocusLostEvent when
>      >>>>>>> disposing. But
>      >>>>>>> I don't know if it is a rule that a FocusLostEvent must be
>     sent to
>      >>>>>>> the
>      >>>>>>> focused>>>    component when the top-level window is disposed ?
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>>>> Well, for regular AWT component it is expected.  And I'd
>     expect that
>      >>>>>> this should also be true for peer.
>      >>>>>
>      >>>>>
>      >>>>> That's right, focus_lost should be dispatched to a disposed focus
>      >>>>> owner.
>      >>>>
>      >>>> So, now we need to figure out why the caret doesn't get the event.
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Oleg.
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> I ran the testcase provided in the webrev and debugged a little.
>      >>> FOCUS_LOST
>      >>> does come to the textarea on its disposal, though when the
>     focus event is
>      >>> being dispatched I see the peer is null.
>      >>> This is quite expected actually. When Component.removeNotify()
>     is called
>      >>> on
>      >>> EDT, it transfers focus further (appropriate focus events get
>     queued) and
>      >>> then nullifies the peer. The events come later.
>      >>> Hope this helps.
>      >>
>      >> Thank you (I do not have Linux, so I can not debug this).
>      >> So, now we know that the cause of the problem is that our internal
>      >> AWTText(Field|Area) may be disposed while they think
>      >> that they are focused, and, at the same time, we can not propogate
>      >> real focus lost to them since peer is desposed
>      >> before we receive the event.
>      >> So, the suggested fix works fine for one particular problem
>     (unstopped
>      >> timer), but we may get some other
>      >> problems due to the cause.
>      >> For me it looks like better fix would be to pass synthetic focus
>     lost
>      >> when we dispose text peer, this way we guarantee
>      >> that life-circle of our synthetic components will be similar to real
>      >> ones and we will meet Swing's expectations.
>      >>
>      >> Does this sounds reasonable?
>      >>
>      >> Regards, Oleg.
>      >
>      >
>      > This sounds reasonable, though I personally don't like the idea
>     of yet
>      > another synthetic focus event...
>
>     well, (synthetic) focus events are your area of expertise ;)
>
>      > I actually like the fix Sean suggested (after we see the whole
>     picture).
>      > Otherwise, we may follow your suggestion
>      > to create AWTTextArea.removeNotify(). And even simpler, why not
>     to put
>      > getCaret().setVisible(false) right into
>     JTextComponent.removeNotify()?
>
>     well, the later is a question for Swing team.
>     The former is reasonable fix (not the best one, but good enough).
>     So, if everyone agree with this approach then I'm fine (hope this is
>     the only problem we
>     will have with invisible focused JTextXXX)
>
>     Oleg.
>
>      >
>      > Either of these looks fine to me.
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      > Anton.
>      >
>      >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Sean Chou
>