<AWT Dev> Review request: 8005932 : Java 7 on mac os x only provides text clipboard formats
Denis S. Fokin
denis.fokin at oracle.com
Fri Feb 8 03:12:01 PST 2013
Hi Mikhail,
the test looks good. I have just noticed that we copied X11
flvormaps.properies file and did not change the text of the comments.
Mentioning of X11 on MacOSX looks confusing.
3 # java.awt.datatransfer.SystemFlavorMap. It contains the X11
platform-specific,
4 # default mappings between common X11 selection atoms and
platform-independent
5 # MIME type strings, which will be converted into
Would you mind changing the text? Additionally, I looked at the jdk6
flavormap.propertires file and noticed that the order of html and rtf
types is different. So we have a chance that we will provide the bet
text flavor java.awt.datatransfer.DataFlavor.selectBestTextFlavor
differently comparing to the jdk6. So I would preserve the order in the
change.
Thank you,
Denis.
On 2/8/2013 1:43 PM, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> New version, with new test:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8005932/webrev.04/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emcherkas/8005932/webrev.04/>
> There I've implemented the test with dnd between two JVM.
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail.
>
> 05.02.2013 16:50, mikhail cherkasov пишет:
>> Hello Denis, All,
>>
>> Here is new version:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8005932/webrev.03/
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emcherkas/8005932/webrev.03/>
>> Please review it.
>>
>> 01.02.2013 19:57, Denis S. Fokin пишет:
>>> Hi Mikhail,
>>> The fix looks good.
>>> As for the test, personally, I would not implement it this way. For
>>> AWT functionality we use Swing library. By this reason we use a hack
>>> with final array.
>>> I would replace the next loop
>>> 108 for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>>> 109 DropObject.getInstance().setCurrentDf(i % 2 == 0 ?
>>> rtfDataFlavor : htmlDataFlavor);
>>> with function invocation where I would directly pass "from" and "to"
>>> points instead of swapping variables.
>>> I am not sure that I am understand the next lines
>>> 203 if (dropObject != null) {
>>> 204 dtde.rejectDrop();
>>> Are we use the transferrable as an initialization flag?
>>> Usually, Transferrable objects contain data that can be converted by
>>> demand into particular type.
>>> The DropObject always returns html as bytes (for the test purposes
>>> this is ok). On the other hand, the condition
>>> 109 DropObject.getInstance().setCurrentDf(i % 2 == 0 ?
>>> rtfDataFlavor : htmlDataFlavor);
>>> should be implemented in transferable and available flavors should be
>>> encapsulated.
>>> The data transfer part of the test should work as follows:
>>> 1. Transferable contains an array with two DataFlavor instances
>>> 2. isDataFlavorSupported returns true if the array contains the
>>> DataFlavor passed as a parameter
>>> 3. getTransferDataFlavors returns the array
>>> 4. getTransferData works as you have implemented it
>>> The transferable does too many things. It can calculate position of
>>> something, draw something on graphics and work as a transferrable.
>>> Calculation and drawing are parts of the test not transferable (what
>>> is more, we calculate position for a panel that does not have direct
>>> relation to the transferred data).
>>> On drop I would prefer to use frame disposal instead of System.exit()
>>> 67 System.exit(0);
>>> The test could be implemented with Clipboard API only. On the other
>>> hand, it could be implemented in a two different processes to verify
>>> that the data is passed between JVMs.
>>> If the current implementation works well on Windows and MacOS X
>>> platforms, I am ok with the webrev.
>>> Thank you,
>>> Denis.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2013, at 5:59 PM, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Denis, All,
>>>>
>>>> There's new version
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8005932/webrev.01/
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emcherkas/8005932/webrev.01/>
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emcherkas/8005932/webrev.01/>
>>>> I exclude solaris's changes and also I've rewritten test.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>
>>>> 30.01.2013 18:13, Denis S. Fokin пишет:
>>>>> Hi Mikhail,
>>>>>
>>>>> the fix for macosx looks ok. I would run jtreg and jck dnd and
>>>>> datatransfer tests with the change.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you gotten any benefits from the solaris change?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Denis.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/29/2013 6:08 PM, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
>>>>>> Hello again,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This bug is still waiting for review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 25.01.2013 19:41, mikhail cherkasov пишет:
>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please review the fix for the following bug:
>>>>>>> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8005932
>>>>>>> Fix:
>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8005932/webrev.00/
>>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emcherkas/8005932/webrev.00/>
>>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emcherkas/8005932/webrev.00/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There's no code changes, I've just added missed mime types to macosx
>>>>>>> and linux flavormap.properties.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list