<AWT Dev> [8] Request for approval for CR 8004693 - TEST_BUG: java/awt/KeyboardFocusmanager/DefaultPolicyChange/DefaultPolicyChange_Swing.java fails

Konstantin Shefov konstantin.shefov at oracle.com
Fri May 31 01:32:59 PDT 2013


Please, review a test bug fix
On 18-Mar-13 16:46, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
> Reminder
> On 12-Feb-13 18:23, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please review a fix for the issue:
>>
>> 8004693 - TEST_BUG: 
>> java/awt/KeyboardFocusmanager/DefaultPolicyChange/DefaultPolicyChange_Swing.java 
>> fails
>>
>> The webrev is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8004693/webrev.00/
>>
>> This test is broken.
>>
>> The test tells the AWT EventQueue to run the method 
>> DefaultPolicyChange_Swing.runTestSwing() (which contains all the 
>> actual test code) at a later time (EventQueue.invokeLater(Runnable)). 
>> By adding a few printlns to that function, it's easy to see that it 
>> starts to run but never finishes. In particular, it never reaches any 
>> of the actual test code.
>>
>> First, "((SunToolkit) SunToolkit.getDefaultToolkit()).realSync();" 
>> should be added after EventQueue.invokeLater() call for all 
>> procedures in this call to be run.
>>
>> After this test starts to fail. It fails since jdk 7 fcs.
>>
>> The fail is caused because test is corrupted.
>>
>> The test should compare JFrame, JWindow and JDialog 
>> FocusTraversalPolicies before 
>> "currentKFM.setDefaultFocusTraversalPolicy(newFTP)" call and after 
>> this call. But instead the test compares something different.
>>
>> In the current variant of this test we see:
>>
>>    FocusTraversalPolicy defaultFTP = 
>> currentKFM.getDefaultFocusTraversalPolicy();
>>
>> It returns object java.awt.DefaultFocusTraversalPolicy at 5fe2d461.
>>
>> But JFrame, JWindow and JDialog objects initially have 
>> "javax.swing.LayoutFocusTraversalPolicy at 2f81dd44" policy.
>> After "currentKFM.setDefaultFocusTraversalPolicy(newFTP)" call they 
>> still have javax.swing.LayoutFocusTraversalPolicy at 2f81dd44.
>>
>> So test should not fail, but it fails.
>>
>> Test needs to be fixed.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Konstantin
>



More information about the awt-dev mailing list