<AWT Dev> [8] Review Request: JDK-8025236 [javadoc] fix some errors in AWT

[Dmitry Ginzburg]

Hi Anthony

I renewed this fix against your issues: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/jdk-8025236/webrev.01/

Thanks,
-Dmitry

01.10.2013 22:14, Anthony Petrov wrote:
> You should only change the <code> issues in lines that are already 
> modified in your fix. No massive reformatting please.
>
> And yes, the rest of the procedure is to publish the second version of 
> the webrev, and post a link to this mailing list.
>
> -- 
> best regards,
> Anthony
>
> On 09/30/2013 05:52 PM, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
>> So, should I fix all the issues with this "<code>"'s, do webrev again
>> and send it to yan, and send it here again?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Dmitry
>>
>> 27.09.2013 17:52, Anthony Petrov wrote:
>>> The fix looks good to me. Again, if possible, I'd suggest to replace
>>> <code> with {@code ..} if you're changing a line anyway.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> best regards,
>>> Anthony
>>>
>>> On 09/26/2013 06:21 PM, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
>>>> Hello, AWT Team.
>>>>
>>>> Please review the fix for the following issue:
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025236
>>>> The fix is available at:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/jdk-8025236/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> This is the fix for javadoc errors, on which doclint was showing some
>>>> issues.
>>>>
>>>> The patch contains only simple markup fixes; no changes/fixes in
>>>> documentation text; the specification itself wasn't changed.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Dmitry


-- 
Dmitry Ginzburg, FXSQE team member