<AWT Dev> [8] Review Request: 8022657 Add FunctionalInterface annotation to awt interfaces
Artem Ananiev
artem.ananiev at oracle.com
Thu Oct 17 07:55:00 PDT 2013
Looks fine.
Thanks,
Artem
On 10/17/2013 6:34 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Hi, Artem.
> Here is updated version.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8022657/webrev.01
>
> On 17.10.2013 18:10, Artem Ananiev wrote:
>> Hi, Sergey,
>>
>> we have a number of listener interfaces in java.awt.event, some of
>> them have a single method, others have multiple. For consistency, I
>> would refrain from marking some of them as @FunctionalInterfaces
>> (though it's technically possible).
>>
>> KeyEventDispatcher and KeyEventPostProcessor are fine.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Artem
>>
>> On 10/16/2013 8:03 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>> Please review the fix for jdk 8.
>>> Some of the classes in awt were marked as FunctionalInterface.
>>>
>>> List of all suggested classes
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-February/004213.html
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022657
>>> Webrev can be found at:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8022657/webrev.00
>>>
>
>
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list