<AWT Dev> Review Request for 8051716: Move AWT_BAT functional tests to OpenJDK (1 of 3)
Dmitriy Ermashov
dmitriy.ermashov at oracle.com
Tue Aug 12 13:35:40 UTC 2014
Hi AWT team,
Could anyone please review the tests?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dermashov/8051716/webrev.01/
Corresponding bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051716
The tests were taken from reliability test framework. So, as one can
see, several tests
do not actual verify anything, but just produce some actions (e.g.
TestFrame.java) and
make sure no dead lock occurs.
On the other hand, there are three tests TaskX* that should be run on
well configured
node, where gcc compiler and other developers libraries should be
installed.
Test were verified on following platforms:
Windows 7 x64
Ubuntu 14.04 x64
Ubuntu 10.04 arm
Solaris 11 x64 (intel)
OS X 10.10 beta
Thanks,
Dima
On 06.08.2014 16:06, Dmitriy Ermashov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a kindly reminder.
>
> Thanks,
> Dima
>
> On 31.07.2014 17:47, Dmitriy Ermashov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review the updated version of tests:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dermashov/8051716/webrev.01/
>>
>> Last changes:
>> 1. All GUI creation/modification moved to EDT
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dima
>>
>> On 28.07.2014 16:21, Dmitriy Ermashov wrote:
>>> Hi AWT team,
>>>
>>> Please review one more batch of functional tests:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dermashov/8051716/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Corresponding bug:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051716
>>>
>>> The tests were taken from reliability test framework. So, as one can
>>> see, several tests
>>> do not actual verify anything, but just produce some actions (e.g.
>>> TestFrame.java) and
>>> make sure no dead lock occurs.
>>> On the other hand, there are three tests TaskX* that should be run
>>> on well configured
>>> node, where gcc compiler and other developers libraries should be
>>> installed.
>>>
>>> Test were verified on following platforms:
>>> Windows 7 x64
>>> Ubuntu 14.04 x64
>>> Ubuntu 10.04 arm
>>> Solaris 11 x64 (intel)
>>> OS X 10.10 beta
>>>
>>
>
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list