<AWT Dev> [9] Review Request: JDK-8043513 Clipboard#getContents(Object) throws IOException

Petr Pchelko petr.pchelko at oracle.com
Thu May 22 21:01:42 UTC 2014


> If I disable clipboard sharing in RDP it works without problems.
>> If I copy something into the clipboard after establishing the connection but before invoking the code it works without problems.
> 
> Petr, do you have any comments about this? Perhaps we should fix the stack trace origin issue under a separate bug id, and leave this bug open to address the original clipboard-shared-over-RDP issue?
I couldn’t reproduce this although I’ve tried really hard. I can fix stack trace origin under separate bugId, but this one I’m going close as cannot reproduce anyway.

More that that, looking at the code which throws the IOException I would say that this is more likely an RDP-client bug, not our bug. All we do here is call winapi function ::EnumClipboardFormats to get all available format and then call ::GetClipboardData for each format from that list. No place for a bug left here.. 

With best regards. Petr.

On May 23, 2014, at 12:52 AM, Anthony Petrov <anthony.petrov at oracle.com> wrote:

> Interesting. I took a closer look at the bug report and found this:
> 
>> If I disable clipboard sharing in RDP it works without problems.
>> If I copy something into the clipboard after establishing the connection but before invoking the code it works without problems.
> 
> Petr, do you have any comments about this? Perhaps we should fix the stack trace origin issue under a separate bug id, and leave this bug open to address the original clipboard-shared-over-RDP issue?
> 
> --
> best regards,
> Anthony
> 
> On 5/22/2014 11:44 PM, Petr Pchelko wrote:
>> Hello, Sergey.
>> 
>>> Submitter complains about IOException itself, not about incorrect stack trace.
>> The IOException is fine.
>> It’s thrown from a different method (not as the stacktace states) and it’s OK by documentation.
>> Just the stack trace is “wrong”.
>> We can’t fix the IOException, because the clipboard was not ready and we can’t do anything about it.
>> 
>> With best regards. Petr.
>> On May 22, 2014, at 10:44 PM, Sergey Bylokhov <Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi, Petr.
>>> Submitter complains about IOException itself, not about incorrect stack trace.
>>> 
>>> On 5/22/14 1:39 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
>>>> Looks fine.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> best regards,
>>>> Anthony
>>>> 
>>>> On 5/21/2014 4:27 PM, Petr Pchelko wrote:
>>>>> Hello, AWT Team.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please review the fox for the issue:
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043513
>>>>> The fix is available at:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8043513/webrev/
>>>>> 
>>>>> The problem:
>>>>> When we fetch all contents from the clipboard we catch IOException and store it for later.
>>>>> In case we would then need the data which caused the exception the cached exception would be rethrown.
>>>>> But the stack trace shows where the exception was created, not thrown. Wrapping it helps to
>>>>> eliminate the misunderstanding.
>>>>> 
>>>>> With best regards. Petr.
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Best regards, Sergey.
>>> 
>> 



More information about the awt-dev mailing list