<AWT Dev> [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] Review Request: 6587235 Incorrect javadoc: "no parameter" in 2d source code

[Phil Race]

I did not slog through all the webrev again but the changed parts look 
good, so "+1".

-phil.

On 5/8/15 3:34 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Hi, Phil.
> Thanks for a review! The new version:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6587235/webrev.01
>
> On 08.05.15 22:52, Phil Race wrote:
>> 273 * <code>RuntimePermission("accessClassInPackage."+pkg)</code>
>>  274      * permission.
>>  275      *
>>  276      * @param      pkgname   the package name.
>>
>>
>> perhaps line 273 should match ?
>>
>> 7      * @param srcArg The first source tile for the compositing 
>> operation.
>>   88      * @param dstIn The second source tile for the compositing 
>> operation.
>>   89      * @param dstOut The tile where the result of the operation 
>> is stored.
>>   90      */
>>   91     public void compose(Raster srcArg, Raster dstIn, 
>> WritableRaster dstOut) {
>>
>> it might be better to rename the actual arguments to match the doc.
>>
>>
>> 47     /**
>>   48      * Construct a new dialog type selection enumeration value 
>> with the
>>   49      * given integer value.
>>   50      *
>>   51      * @param  frame  Integer value.
>>   52      */
>>   53     public DialogOwner(Frame frame) {
>>
>> Huh ? The entire doc seems to be nonsense .. changing the name of the 
>> param
>> just makes it worse. The text seems to have been copied from
>> javax.attribute.standard.DialogTypeSelection.java
>>
>>
>> -phil.
>>
>> On 05/08/2015 12:25 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>> Please review the fix for a typos in jdk9. This CR was filed by me 
>>> long time ago and I doubt that someone will take a look at it.
>>> I fixed all clients files in sun.** subpackages.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6587235
>>> Webrev can be found at: 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6587235/webrev.00
>>>
>>
>
>