<AWT Dev> [9] Review Request: 8177841 Some java/awt/Robot tests can be improved
Semyon Sadetsky
semyon.sadetsky at oracle.com
Thu Apr 6 20:26:37 UTC 2017
On 04/06/2017 01:09 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>
>> Sergey, could you replace CountDownLatch::await() call with its
>> limited wait time analog. If the test fails it blocks execution for 2
>> minutes in the current version.
>>
> 2 minutes is a default time out for jtreg tests, if something goes
> wrong like something hangs, then we wait 2 minutes and interrupt the test.
> After interruption the jtreg will generate the dump for all threads
> which can be useful to check why the event was not generated by the robot.
You are able to print out this useful information after timeout in the
catch block. I would prefer to avoid any infinite waiting because if the
listener is not triggered in several second it will unlikely be
triggered at all. But if a number of such tests fails for some reason
the execution time becomes so long that the test report cannot be
obtained in a reasonable time.
>
>>
>> On 04/06/2017 10:57 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>> Here is an updated version:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8177841/webrev.01/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eserb/8177841/webrev.01/>
>>> It will save 5 sec per test, so probably the simpler .00 version can
>>> be reevaluated.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/30/2017 10:27 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>> sun.java2d.win.uiScaleX/Y is only applicable to windows which is
>>>>>> likely why the test had
>>>>>> @requires (os.family == "windows") even if it was not the right
>>>>>> name. Now you are running unconditionally with those properties
>>>>>> on all platforms which seems to be a waste of time.
>>>>> Yes, if we know that uiScaleX/Y are windows specific then 2 modes
>>>>> out of 5 is noop. But I do not like to exclude them, instead I
>>>>> would like to fuzz the tests by supported/unsupported properties,
>>>>> in the same way as 2d-tests are executed using different
>>>>> supported/unsupprted "sun.java2d.XXX" pipelines.
>>>> The test can be separated on two tests: one is Windows specific
>>>> and another is general.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alexandr.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 03/30/2017 12:11 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> Please review the fix for jdk9.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Initially I found a typo in the HiDPIRobotMouseClick.java. It contains the «Dsun.java2d.win.uiScale» option, which should be Dsun.java2d.uiScale or Dsun.java2d.win.uiScaleX/Y.
>>>>>>> But when I verified the fix, the test fails if executed w/o any options (my system has 125% DPI).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I decided to update it and related HiDPIRobotScreenCaptureTest to validated more modes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Default(w/o options), useful if the system has some default scale.
>>>>>>> - scale = 1 is useful when the tests are executed on HiDPI systems.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not sure why these tests sets the Windows L&F because it uses only awt Frame.
>>>>>>> I’ll file a separate bug for HiDPIRobotMouseClick.java + 125% DPI.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177841
>>>>>>> Webrev can be found at:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8177841/webrev.00
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/attachments/20170406/1e94c622/attachment.html>
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list