<AWT Dev> [11] Review Request: JDK-8196435 Regression automated Test 'java/awt/Mouse/GetMousePositionTest/GetMousePositionWithOverlay.java' fails

[Sergey Bylokhov]

Looks fine.

On 06/03/2018 02:48, Prem Balakrishnan wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
> 
> Please review the updated patch:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/8196435/webrev.02/
> 
> Regards,
> Prem
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergey Bylokhov
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 10:27 PM
> To: Prem Balakrishnan <prem.balakrishnan at oracle.com>; awt-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: <AWT Dev> [11] Review Request: JDK-8196435 Regression automated Test 'java/awt/Mouse/GetMousePositionTest/GetMousePositionWithOverlay.java' fails
> 
> On 01/03/2018 20:16, Prem Balakrishnan wrote:
>> The existing waitForIdle() call at line 55 is called after calling setVisible() for both the frames (which I have removed in proposed fix). I have added waitForIdle() call after calling setVisible() for each frame(at line 103 and 110 in proposed fix), which ensures frontFrame is rendered on top of backFrame.
> 
> I doubt that this will fix the problem - it will decrease the possibility of such behavior.
> Please add toBack()/toFront calls for these frames to make a correct order.
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Prem
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sergey Bylokhov
>> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 3:19 AM
>> To: Prem Balakrishnan <prem.balakrishnan at oracle.com>;
>> awt-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: <AWT Dev> [11] Review Request: JDK-8196435 Regression
>> automated Test
>> 'java/awt/Mouse/GetMousePositionTest/GetMousePositionWithOverlay.java'
>> fails
>>
>> Hi, Prem.
>> On 26/02/2018 21:20, Prem Balakrishnan wrote:
>>> At times backFrame is rendered on top of frontFrame, due to which mouse position on backFrame is not NULL and test fails, solved this by adding waitForIdle() calls appropriately. Furthermore, mousemove from frontFrame to backFrame, caused the cursor to change to resize cursor and test fails, solved this by setting setResizable() to false.
>>
>> But the old version of the test also call Util.waitForIdle(null) after frames were shown at line 55.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards, Sergey.
> 


-- 
Best regards, Sergey.