<AWT Dev> RFR: 8243925 Toolkit#getScreenInsets() returns wrong value on HiDPI screens (Windows)
Prasanta Sadhukhan
prasanta.sadhukhan at oracle.com
Sun May 17 11:04:06 UTC 2020
OK. Looks good then.
Regards
Prasanta
On 15-May-20 8:31 PM, Philip Race wrote:
> The whole point is to test a headful config and in any case :-
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/Toolkit.html#getScreenInsets(java.awt.GraphicsConfiguration)
>
> publicInsets <https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/Insets.html> getScreenInsets(GraphicsConfiguration <https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/GraphicsConfiguration.html> gc)
> throwsHeadlessException <https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/HeadlessException.html>
> Gets the insets of the screen.
>
> Parameters:
> |gc| - a |GraphicsConfiguration|
> Returns:
> the insets of this toolkit's screen, in pixels.
> Throws:
> |HeadlessException
> <https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/HeadlessException.html>|
> - if GraphicsEnvironment.isHeadless() returns true
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> -phil
>
>
> On 5/15/20, 3:31 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>
>> On 15-May-20 3:59 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>> On 5/14/20 10:52 pm, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>> I believe the test should not be marked headful as no visible
>>>> component is being shown. Rest looks ok.
>>>
>>> If this keyword will be removed then the test will be skipped during
>>> our headful testing on headful systems.
>>>
>> Yes, but what is the problem if it will be tested as headless? why
>> there is a need to test on headful systems?
>>>> Regards
>>>> Prasanta
>>>> On 14-May-20 7:44 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>> On 5/13/20 11:51 pm, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>>> Shouldn't we need to use ScaleDownY() for top and bottom?
>>>>>> Also, I think you like to rename runPocess() to runProcess() in
>>>>>> the test ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Right! I have also updated the test from which I copied the typo:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8243925/webrev.05
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Prasanta
>>>>>> On 08-May-20 11:39 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi, Prasanta.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Linux, it should generally pass because we already scale the
>>>>>>> insets there,
>>>>>>> but sometimes this test fails due to size mismatches, we have
>>>>>>> some rounding
>>>>>>> issues during the calculation and conversion from the device to
>>>>>>> userspace.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It looks like when I commented out the fractional scales I also
>>>>>>> accidentally
>>>>>>> delete the assertion in the test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is an update test:
>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8243925/webrev.04
>>>>>>> The fractional scales were returned, but the test is excluded on
>>>>>>> Linux. I
>>>>>>> will fix that separately.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/7/20 2:27 am, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Sergey,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The regression test pass for me on windows and linux even
>>>>>>>> without the fix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Prasanta
>>>>>>>> On 30-Apr-20 3:10 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>>> Please review the fix for jdk/client.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8243925
>>>>>>>>> Fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8243925/webrev.02
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One more place when we return the data in pixels, without
>>>>>>>>> proper conversation to the user's space.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On macOS, this conversion is done by the OS, on Linux we already
>>>>>>>>> convert the data. The only missing platform is Windows. Note that
>>>>>>>>> we still have an inadequate specification for this and some other
>>>>>>>>> Toolkit API which states that results are in "in pixels".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will file the separate bug to update the spec because this bug
>>>>>>>>> I would like to backport to 11.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The bug was found during work on
>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231564
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/attachments/20200517/808531aa/attachment.htm>
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list