<AWT Dev> Clarification regarding PageFormat and Paper getImageable* functions orientation consideration

[Philip Race]

Wrong list. That is a 2D API.

-phil.

On 3/22/21 12:09 PM, Rajat Mahajan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> *_Issue:_*
>
> *__*
>
> I am working on https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203395 
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203395>  and this bug is 
> about *“PageFormat showing wrong printer margins in LANDSCAPE 
> orientation” .*
>
> **
>
> *Application code it trying to print in Landscape and Portrait but 
> both show same margins:*
>
> Margins default : 12,12,17,17
>
> Margins OrientationRequested.LANDSCAPE : 12,12,17,17
>
> **
>
> *The code of the application uses Paper object for getting margins :*
>
> PageFormat pf = printerJob.getPageFormat(aset);
>
>        Paper paper = pf.getPaper();
>
>        long paperTopMargin = Math.round(paper.getImageableY());
>        long paperLeftMargin = Math.round(paper.getImageableX());
>        long paperRightMargin = Math.round(paper.getWidth() - 
> paper.getImageableWidth() - paperLeftMargin);
>        long paperBottomMargin = Math.round(paper.getHeight() - 
> paper.getImageableHeight() - paperTopMargin);
>
> When I looked at the latest JDK code, PageFormat getImageable 
> functions are taking into account Orientation and Paper getImageable 
> functions are not , and hence we see the same output.
>
> Using Page format object instead of Paper shows the correct output:
>
> Margins default : 12,12,17,17
>
> Margins OrientationRequested.LANDSCAPE : 17,17,12,12
>
> *_Question:_*
>
> My question is that should Paper getImageable* functions also need 
> take into account orientation as per spec ?, or is the current 
> behavior of them not considering orientation correct and why ?
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/attachments/20210322/e04c629b/attachment-0001.htm>