<AWT Dev> RFR: 8255800: Raster creation methods need some specification clean up
Sergey Bylokhov
serb at openjdk.java.net
Wed Mar 31 21:26:13 UTC 2021
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:53:44 GMT, Phil Race <prr at openjdk.org> wrote:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8255800 could have been a one line spec clean up but
> it didn't take a lot of looking to realize there were many more inconsistencies between spec and implementation.
> I've spent a lot of time on what is just small number of factory methods in Raster because there are so
> many possible exceptions and in some cases they rely on other API they call to generate exceptions and
> these may have not been documented or documented acc. to some long lost behavior.
> I've mostly tried to ONLY change spec. But I couldn't help myself when some checks were missed that
> ended up with bizarre and dubious behavior - throwing NegativeArrayIndexException which just about
> always has to be an internal bug !
>
> The supplied test passes on JDK 16 as well as this code, because the (relatively) small number of
> cases where JDK 16 threw NegativeArrayIndexException are caught and allowed only for releases < 17
> So where you see those in the test it corresponds to the behavioral changes from NegativeArrayIndexException
> to IllegalArgumentException.
> JCK conformance tests still pass so they must not test those conditions.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/Raster.java line 263:
> 261: * both > 0
> 262: * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the product of {@code w}
> 263: * and {@code h} is greater than {@code Integer.MAX_VALUE}
Do we really want to specify this? I hit this bug during HiDPI work and it seems this is an implementation bug that we do not support big size(w*h).
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/Raster.java line 337:
> 335: * {@code DataBuffer.TYPE_BYTE},
> 336: * {@code DataBuffer.TYPE_USHORT}
> 337: * or {@code DataBuffer.TYPE_INT}
What about other types like TYPE_SHORT or we assume it is unsupported?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3223
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list