[code-reflection] RFR: Support array type constants in code model [v3]
Hannes Greule
hgreule at openjdk.org
Mon Jan 22 19:31:12 UTC 2024
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:41:51 GMT, Paul Sandoz <psandoz at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Sure, would you prefer it in the same test case or should I create addtional methods?
>
> I recommend a separate test like the others, then the tests are focused and don't include additional operations to package up multiple values and return them.
I added some tests with primitive arrays and more dimensions.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/babylon/pull/5#discussion_r1462312657
More information about the babylon-dev
mailing list