[code-reflection] RFR: JavaRef extends TypeElement
    Paul Sandoz 
    psandoz at openjdk.org
       
    Wed Apr 30 18:26:02 UTC 2025
    
    
  
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:29:59 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadamore at openjdk.org> wrote:
> In the grammar for Java types, it would perhaps be better to start with:
> 
> ```
> javaType
>   primitiveType | classType | arrayType | typeVariableType
> 
> javaTypeArgument
>   wildcardType | javaType
> ```
> 
Good point, I was basically trying to reverse engineer from our current implementation to more easily spot patterns/structure. It indicates we have some bugs in our implementation of the java type factories! Let's address this separately (and we can place the grammar in the repo somewhere).
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/babylon/pull/416#issuecomment-2842909769
    
    
More information about the babylon-dev
mailing list