[code-reflection] RFR: Model lifetimes of onnx session-related objects more explicitly

[Maurizio Cimadamore]

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 09:39:17 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadamore at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I believe the question here is what kind of high-level API would it make sense for babylon users to interact with -- which is a separate question from "how should Java bindings for ONNX look like"

(at least that's how I interpreted @PaulSandoz comment: https://github.com/openjdk/babylon/pull/332#issuecomment-2691545090)

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/babylon/pull/332#discussion_r1977187114