From Peter.Rushforth at NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca  Wed Jul 25 05:55:45 2012
From: Peter.Rushforth at NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca (Rushforth, Peter)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:55:45 +0000
Subject: <Beans Dev> java beans bug?
Message-ID: <1CD55F04538DEA4F85F3ADF7745464AF1AE2B160@S-BSC-MBX4.nrn.nrcan.gc.ca>

Hi,

I have a problem with running a program at java 7, and in fact on java 6 on 
non-commercial platform (ubuntu).  But it is really the fact that java 7 is
telling me to upgrade that concerns me, so I wonder if you could help tell me if
a) this is in fact a bug and b) if there as a jvm switch /setting that can be
used to allow this backwards-compatibility.

The problem is that a particular setter is not found at java 7, for the code as attached,
whereas it is found at java 6 (on windows and rhel java, at least).

This a maven project, which you don't actually have to run, but the comments in the pom
file will show you the output if you do run it.  Here is the output under java 6 & 7:

C:\Documents and Settings\...>"%JAVA_HOME%\bin\java" -cp . JavaBeansBug
java version: 1.6.0_24
created object, introspecting with java.beans.BeanInfo
NO SETTER:class

C:\Documents and Settings\...>java -cp . JavaBeansBug
java version: 1.7.0
created object, introspecting with java.beans.BeanInfo
NO SETTER:class
NO SETTER:providerManager


Thanks for any advice.  I can't change the code because it belongs to public libraries which
no longer seem maintained.  I have distilled the issue to the above sample code, I think.

Peter Rushforth
Technology Advisor / Conseiller technique
GeoConnections / G?oConnexions
650-615 Booth St. / rue Booth
Ottawa ON K1A 0E9
E-mail / Courriel: Peter.Rushforth at NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca 
Phone / T?lephone: (613) 943-0784 
Fax / telecopier:  (613) 947-2410
 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pom.xml
Type: text/xml
Size: 3110 bytes
Desc: pom.xml
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/beans-dev/attachments/20120725/4f2371ef/pom.xml 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: AbstractServiceContext.java
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: AbstractServiceContext.java
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/beans-dev/attachments/20120725/4f2371ef/AbstractServiceContext.java 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ServiceContext.java
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 88 bytes
Desc: ServiceContext.java
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/beans-dev/attachments/20120725/4f2371ef/ServiceContext.java 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Provider.java
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 69 bytes
Desc: Provider.java
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/beans-dev/attachments/20120725/4f2371ef/Provider.java 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: JavaBeansBug.java
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 791 bytes
Desc: JavaBeansBug.java
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/beans-dev/attachments/20120725/4f2371ef/JavaBeansBug.java 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ItemManager.java
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 87 bytes
Desc: ItemManager.java
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/beans-dev/attachments/20120725/4f2371ef/ItemManager.java 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DefaultServiceContext.java
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: DefaultServiceContext.java
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/beans-dev/attachments/20120725/4f2371ef/DefaultServiceContext.java 

From Sergey.Malenkov at oracle.com  Wed Jul 25 07:54:23 2012
From: Sergey.Malenkov at oracle.com (Sergey Malenkov)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:54:23 +0400
Subject: <Beans Dev> java beans bug?
In-Reply-To: <1CD55F04538DEA4F85F3ADF7745464AF1AE2B160@S-BSC-MBX4.nrn.nrcan.gc.ca>
References: <1CD55F04538DEA4F85F3ADF7745464AF1AE2B160@S-BSC-MBX4.nrn.nrcan.gc.ca>
Message-ID: <5010089F.8030301@oracle.com>

Hi Peter,

This is an issue in the following constructor:
PropertyDescriptor(PropertyDescriptor,PropertyDescriptor).
Could you please file a bug?
http://bugreport.sun.com/bugreport/

Thanks,
SAM

On 25.07.2012 16:55, Rushforth, Peter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with running a program at java 7, and in fact on java 6 on
> non-commercial platform (ubuntu).  But it is really the fact that java 7 is
> telling me to upgrade that concerns me, so I wonder if you could help tell me if
> a) this is in fact a bug and b) if there as a jvm switch /setting that can be
> used to allow this backwards-compatibility.
>
> The problem is that a particular setter is not found at java 7, for the code as attached,
> whereas it is found at java 6 (on windows and rhel java, at least).
>
> This a maven project, which you don't actually have to run, but the comments in the pom
> file will show you the output if you do run it.  Here is the output under java 6&  7:
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\...>"%JAVA_HOME%\bin\java" -cp . JavaBeansBug
> java version: 1.6.0_24
> created object, introspecting with java.beans.BeanInfo
> NO SETTER:class
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\...>java -cp . JavaBeansBug
> java version: 1.7.0
> created object, introspecting with java.beans.BeanInfo
> NO SETTER:class
> NO SETTER:providerManager
>
>
> Thanks for any advice.  I can't change the code because it belongs to public libraries which
> no longer seem maintained.  I have distilled the issue to the above sample code, I think.
>
> Peter Rushforth
> Technology Advisor / Conseiller technique
> GeoConnections / G?oConnexions
> 650-615 Booth St. / rue Booth
> Ottawa ON K1A 0E9
> E-mail / Courriel: Peter.Rushforth at NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca
> Phone / T?lephone: (613) 943-0784
> Fax / telecopier:  (613) 947-2410
>


From Sergey.Malenkov at oracle.com  Wed Jul 25 09:00:27 2012
From: Sergey.Malenkov at oracle.com (Sergey Malenkov)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:00:27 +0400
Subject: <Beans Dev> [8] Review request for 7122740: PropertyDescriptor
	Performance Slow
Message-ID: <5010181B.3090806@oracle.com>

Hi everyone,

Please review the fix.
I've improved the performance a little bit.

Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7122740
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/7122740.0/

Thanks,
SAM


From Peter.Rushforth at NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca  Wed Jul 25 09:43:52 2012
From: Peter.Rushforth at NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca (Rushforth, Peter)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:43:52 +0000
Subject: <Beans Dev> java beans bug?
In-Reply-To: <5010089F.8030301@oracle.com>
References: <1CD55F04538DEA4F85F3ADF7745464AF1AE2B160@S-BSC-MBX4.nrn.nrcan.gc.ca>
	<5010089F.8030301@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <1CD55F04538DEA4F85F3ADF7745464AF1AE2B3EE@S-BSC-MBX4.nrn.nrcan.gc.ca>

Hi Sergey,

I think I filed a bug in the right place.  Because it cuts across
versions and platforms I chose windows and java 7.  I also put it in 
the java SE.

I hope the bug report comes through and provides sufficient detail.

I will try again, if not!

Thanks, and regards,
Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergey Malenkov [mailto:Sergey.Malenkov at oracle.com] 
> Sent: July 25, 2012 10:54
> To: Rushforth, Peter
> Cc: beans-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: <Beans Dev> java beans bug?
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> This is an issue in the following constructor:
> PropertyDescriptor(PropertyDescriptor,PropertyDescriptor).
> Could you please file a bug?
> http://bugreport.sun.com/bugreport/
> 
> Thanks,
> SAM
> 
> On 25.07.2012 16:55, Rushforth, Peter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a problem with running a program at java 7, and in 
> fact on java 
> > 6 on non-commercial platform (ubuntu).  But it is really 
> the fact that 
> > java 7 is telling me to upgrade that concerns me, so I 
> wonder if you 
> > could help tell me if
> > a) this is in fact a bug and b) if there as a jvm switch 
> /setting that 
> > can be used to allow this backwards-compatibility.
> >
> > The problem is that a particular setter is not found at java 7, for 
> > the code as attached, whereas it is found at java 6 (on 
> windows and rhel java, at least).
> >
> > This a maven project, which you don't actually have to run, but the 
> > comments in the pom file will show you the output if you do 
> run it.  Here is the output under java 6&  7:
> >
> > C:\Documents and Settings\...>"%JAVA_HOME%\bin\java" -cp . 
> > JavaBeansBug java version: 1.6.0_24 created object, 
> introspecting with 
> > java.beans.BeanInfo NO SETTER:class
> >
> > C:\Documents and Settings\...>java -cp . JavaBeansBug java version: 
> > 1.7.0 created object, introspecting with java.beans.BeanInfo NO 
> > SETTER:class NO SETTER:providerManager
> >
> >
> > Thanks for any advice.  I can't change the code because it 
> belongs to public libraries which
> > no longer seem maintained.  I have distilled the issue to 
> the above sample code, I think.
> >
> > Peter Rushforth
> > Technology Advisor / Conseiller technique
> > GeoConnections / G?oConnexions
> > 650-615 Booth St. / rue Booth
> > Ottawa ON K1A 0E9
> > E-mail / Courriel: Peter.Rushforth at NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca
> > Phone / T?lephone: (613) 943-0784
> > Fax / telecopier:  (613) 947-2410
> >
> 

From Sergey.Malenkov at oracle.com  Sun Jul 29 08:46:31 2012
From: Sergey.Malenkov at oracle.com (Sergey Malenkov)
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:46:31 +0400
Subject: <Beans Dev> [8] Review request for 7169395: Exception throws due to
 the changes in JDK 7 object tranversal and break backward compatibility
Message-ID: <50155AD7.4050500@oracle.com>

Hi everyone,

Please review the fix.
I've improved the performance a little bit.

Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7169395
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/7169395.0/

Thanks,
SAM


From Sergey.Malenkov at oracle.com  Sun Jul 29 08:53:17 2012
From: Sergey.Malenkov at oracle.com (Sergey Malenkov)
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:53:17 +0400
Subject: <Beans Dev> [8] Review request for 7169395: Exception throws due to
 the changes in JDK 7 object tranversal and break backward compatibility
Message-ID: <50155C6D.7020102@oracle.com>

Hi everyone,

Could you please review the fix?

Now I do not process inner statements for a simple reference, but the 
following tag without inners tags does not have any sense:
	<void idref="id"/>

Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7169395
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/7169395.0/

Thanks,
SAM