<Beans Dev> Fwd: Re: [PATCH] test/jdk/java/beans/PropertyEditor/Test6397609.java failed in JITed code

[Jie Fu]

Hi Sergey,

Thank you very much for your kind review.

Is the patch[1] OK to be pushed?
Or what should I do next?

Thanks again.

Best regards,
Jie

[1] 
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/beans-dev/2019-January/000388.html


On 2019/1/10 上午6:16, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> On 08/01/2019 23:19, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> An existed tests in for beans which use OOM are run as tier3 tests, 
>>> and as far as I know do not cause some unexpected failures?
>>> If you do not suggest to rewrite an existed tests, then it will be 
>>> better in this case to use the same solution.
>>>
>> If someone has cycles then it would be good to cleanup the other 
>> tests too. You mentioned agentvm in one of your mails and that may be 
>> one motivation to avoid triggering OOME in random places.
>
> Mention of "agentvm" mode was an example for why some of the corelibs 
> tests works, since gc is triggered by some other tests and not as a 
> result of System.gc(). If the tests uses OOM then it should set xmx 
> which is not possible in agentvm mode, btw all client tests uses othervm.
>
>