Patch to build 64 bit VM
Greg Lewis
glewis at eyesbeyond.com
Sun Dec 28 12:55:41 PST 2008
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:29:26AM -0800, Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 09:27:36AM -0800, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 11:34:58PM -0800, Xiaobin Lu wrote:
> > > So with my openjdk id, I can commit the changes without extra permission?
> >
> > I think I should have looked harder at the change first, sorry. I tried
> > compiling with that change in and it broke the i386 build :(. I'm looking
> > at things side by side with the current Linux code to try and get the
> > braces and #ifdef's right, but I have to say this part of the code is
> > becoming quite confusing with the proliferation of preprocessor
> > conditionals.
> >
> > I hope to have something later today that you can test on Mac OS X.
>
> Instead I shovelled snow/ice for a couple of days so we could get out of
> our house to the main roads :).
>
> Anyway, attached is a patch. Its not yet compile tested, I've got the
> compile started however and will check in the morning. Please give it
> a try on Mac OS X. Basically it looks like the special handling for
> 64 bit Mac OS X was half merged into the x86 handling.
Oops, as Kurt pointed out I forgot to attach the patch... Trying again.
> > > Greg Lewis wrote:
> > > > G'day Xiaobin,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:06:30AM -0800, Xiaobin Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I am attaching the patch to make the VM build pass on Mac OS 64 bit.
> > > >> Here is some explanation on the change:
> > > >>
> > > >> bytes_bsd_x86.inline.cpp:
> > > >>
> > > >> Change bswap16(x) to bswap_16(x) and the similar, I believe there was a
> > > >> typo for this. When some ported this to Apple platform, they missed a
> > > >> underscore.
> > > >>
> > > >> os_bsd_x86.cpp
> > > >>
> > > >> There was a "}" missing for 64 bit build.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Thats a lot clearer when I use diff -b :).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Other changes to make the build pass will be covered by my fix to
> > > >> 6787106 which I am going to put back to open JDK 7 tree soon.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please help me review the patch and feel free to let me know if there
> > > >> was anything wrong.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Looks good to me -- I say go ahead and commit it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Greg Lewis wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> G'day Xiaobin,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:14:16PM -0800, Xiaobin Lu wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I am attaching the patch for building 64 bit VM. They are BSD specific
> > > >>>> files. Would someone review it and help me check it in?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> Sure. Can you comment a little on the changes to
> > > >>> src/os_cpu/bsd_x86/vm/bytes_bsd_x86.inline.hpp? It seems like the diff is
> > > >>> bigger than the changes if that makes sense (i.e. there are some whitespace
> > > >>> changes due to control flow changes which are hiding those).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Greg Lewis Email : glewis at eyesbeyond.com
> > Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
> > Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis at FreeBSD.org
>
> --
> Greg Lewis Email : glewis at eyesbeyond.com
> Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
> Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis at FreeBSD.org
--
Greg Lewis Email : glewis at eyesbeyond.com
Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis at FreeBSD.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: os_bsd_x86.cpp.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1819 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/attachments/20081228/6bc86815/os_bsd_x86.cpp.diff
More information about the bsd-port-dev
mailing list