merges, commit rights and other OSes
Andrew John Hughes
gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org
Tue Aug 25 12:30:17 PDT 2009
2009/8/25 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>:
> 2009/8/25 Christian Thalinger <Christian.Thalinger at sun.com>:
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> True, but I don't see the advantage in destroying the history just to
>>> make the changes into a more convenient set of changesets.
>>
>> Well, at least when the bsd-port is commited back to jdk7, the history
>> is destroyed anyway. I never used Mercurial's rebase, but maybe we can
>> keep changes in separate changesets and push them (hopefully) up to
>> jdk7, with history?
>>
>> -- Christian
>>
>
> Depends how you commit it back; in theory you should be able to hg
> export the changeset and hg import --exact it to the gate repository,
> which will attach it to the same parent changesets. I've done this
> between icedtea and JDK7 repositories.
>
> The only problem I do foresee is jtreg as I doubt the comments for
> these changesets have Sun bug IDs... sigh.-
> --
> Andrew :-)
>
> Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Support Free Java!
> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
> http://openjdk.java.net
>
> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>
Sorry, not jtreg, jcheck -- too many j* names... :)
--
Andrew :-)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net
PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
More information about the bsd-port-dev
mailing list