Dynamically linked libjli for *BSD
Jung-uk Kim
jkim at FreeBSD.org
Mon May 18 17:14:30 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 05/18/2015 02:52, Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:30:26AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> On May 16, 3:06pm, kurt at intricatesoftware.com (Kurt Miller)
>> wrote: -- Subject: Dynamically linked libjli for *BSD
>>
>> | Hi Greg, Christos, | | Currently building the jdk with debug
>> symbols fails on OpenBSD and | I suspect at least FreeBSD (since
>> it is disabled in the ports tree | java/openjdk8/Makefile too).
>> This was determined to be caused by | libjli being statically
>> linked on *BSD. [1] | | Statically linking libjli was a
>> work-around introduced in 1.5 or 1.6 | most likely due to the
>> lack of rpath $ORIGIN support in our runtime | linkers. All of
>> the BSD's have rpath $ORIGIN support for several | years now. I
>> propose that we eliminate linking libjli statically and | remove
>> another difference we have in the build when compared to | Linux
>> and Solaris. Dynamically linking libjli fixes the build with |
>> debug symbols. | | Please review/test this diff on FreeBSD and
>> NetBSD and let me know if | you are okay with the change.
>>
>> Works on NetBSD. Just a note, $ORIGIN support is not fully
>> implemented on NetBSD, there is a #ifdef notyet in kern_exec.c...
>> But running java with a full path in $0 works. I'd say apply it
>> if it works for others.
>
> Works for me too on FreeBSD 10.1.
A PR with the same idea was filed but I rejected it:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193009
Actually, we had a $ORIGIN problem, which affected some ports, e.g.,
java/icedtea-web. I fixed it in r279364 for head and MFC'ed in
r279713, r279714 and r279715 to stable/10, stable/9 and stable/8,
respectively.
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279364
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279713
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279714
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279715
Unfortunately, no FreeBSD *release* has this fix.
Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVWh3xAAoJEHyflib82/FG09EH/3eJM/nVl13fQwxFtt3adRW0
Sm5zg+19tpj85/h2rdan6fwFzmTOxFOEoLeUJh7uwS5TVj7FVmzUftR+nWS7bN8G
38TD58sYFqu9dV7qW6clwclvuYDA1i1EPfTsxKCSiZd9ZcZQYrdBmbjnUbb21PMQ
DQsj7fNLhkOQhekRXsy05WTlPC3OU8gak6Sfn9SnOYl/OBXX07+pRv+ghPbqjEO0
9ulv9tprn2b6GCWKlEEo6pe7N8VZsdkZfWVBlTL6KwWbMQD8qWCgP2EcxZbqLV81
h9KdCKJvxSxYyN6uaqCOZHdVqOJQGkMOshVj/TJbQpM/68b9j5xswC3mY6mrrak=
=c8CK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bsd-port-dev
mailing list