<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Yes, it was my thought that my nomination signaled a "Yes" vote,
and didn't follow up with an actual "Yes" vote e-mail, so my bad.
But it does meet the Lazy Consensus requirements regardless.</p>
<p>-- Greg</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/12/25 4:51 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d5aac3ae-8a72-4212-b9c6-573e4c4ec09f@oracle.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>It's a bit odd to have a vote concluded as approved with no
"Yes" votes (or no votes at all), but I guess the nomination
itself counts as an indirect endorsement.</p>
<p>/Magnus<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2025-07-26 23:52, Greg Lewis
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0101019848b8e817-4bd4632c-44c5-46e2-9427-2d765f901534-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com">
<pre>The vote for Harald Eilertsen [1] is now closed.
Yes: 0
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
Greg Lewis
[1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/2025-June/003236.html"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/2025-June/003236.html</a></pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>