encumbrances update

[Ted Neward]

By the way, Igor, I had to copy the "ftbuild.h" file into the "freetype2"
directory and put *that* directory on the FREETYPE_INCLUDE variable to make
it work. I still haven't gotten  regular freetype-2.3.x build to work,
unfortunately--it builds the DLL, but not the import lib. :-/

Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil.Race at Sun.COM [mailto:Phil.Race at Sun.COM]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 9:00 PM
> To: Ted Neward
> Cc: 'Igor Nekrestyanov'; 'Dan Fabulich'; discuss at openjdk.java.net;
> 'Anthony Petrov'; build-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: encumbrances update
> 
> freetypecheck.c(42) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for
> macro
> 'QUO
> TEME'
> 
> Did it really print a newline in the middle of that name ?
> 
> your make/tools/freetypecheck/freetypecheck.c  may be corrupt.
> 
> the macro is  defined there  and  its hard to  imagine how it could  be
> affected by anything exernal.
> 
> -phil.
> 
> Ted Neward wrote:
> > OK... Using a private drop of Ivan's freetype build, with an "SVN
> update" of
> > the source base, I get this:
> >
> > CYGWIN:Ted at XPJAVA:/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/make
> > $ make sanity
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make'
> > make[2]: Entering directory
> > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make/tools/fre
> > etypecheck'
> > Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 13.10.3077 for
> 80x86
> > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1984-2002. All rights reserved.
> >
> > freetypecheck.c
> > freetypecheck.c(42) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for
> macro
> > 'QUO
> > TEME'
> > freetypecheck.c(42) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> > freetypecheck.c(45) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for
> macro
> > 'QUO
> > TEME'
> > freetypecheck.c(45) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> > freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before '&'
> > freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before '&'
> > freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2059: syntax error : '&'
> > freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> > freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2059: syntax error : ','
> > freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before '&'
> > freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before '&'
> > freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2059: syntax error : '&'
> > freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> > freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2059: syntax error : ','
> > freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before
> > 'string'
> > freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before
> > 'string'
> > freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2059: syntax error : '<Unknown>'
> > freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> > freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before
> > 'string'
> > freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before
> > 'string'
> > freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2059: syntax error : '<Unknown>'
> > freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> > freetypecheck.c(54) : error C2059: syntax error : 'if'
> > freetypecheck.c(54) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for
> macro
> > 'QUO
> > TEME'
> > freetypecheck.c(58) : error C2059: syntax error : 'return'
> > freetypecheck.c(59) : error C2059: syntax error : '}'
> > make[2]: ***
> > [c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1/tmp/freetype_version
> > check] Error 2
> > make[2]: Leaving directory
> > `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make/tools/free
> > typecheck'
> > make[1]: [sane-freetype] Error 2 (ignored)
> > /bin/sh:
> > c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1/tmp/freetype_versioncheck
> > .exe: No such file or directory
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make'
> >
> > Somebody have an idea what's going on here? (Obviously, freetypecheck.c
> > isn't building, but I'm not sure why, beyond the obvious "there's a
> macro
> > without enough parameters" as declared on line 42....)
> >
> > Ted Neward
> > Java, .NET, XML Services
> > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> > http://www.tedneward.com
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev-
> >> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Igor Nekrestyanov
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 12:39 PM
> >> To: Dan Fabulich
> >> Cc: discuss at openjdk.java.net; Anthony Petrov; Phil Race; build-
> >> dev at openjdk.java.net
> >> Subject: Re: encumbrances update
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>> My tests are not "ideal" for number of reasons:
> >>>> 2) I was using binary plugs created from my personal workspace.
> >>>>      I believe they should be the same as those to be published with
> >>>> b17 code drop but this is my assumption.
> >>>>
> >>> We know for certain that this assumption is FALSE.  No binary plug
> >>> given to the public has ever built successfully on Windows; since your
> >>> personal plugs have been working for you for months, we can conclude
> >>> that there's something critically different between your plugs and the
> >>> plugs we get.
> >>>
> >> Prior to introduction of the "binary plugs" in the makefile (starting
> >> from the b16)
> >> it was easy to use our internal product builds to import encumbered
> bits
> >> for openjdk build.
> >> So, internal openjdk builds were easier.
> >>
> >> However, since b16 we need to export image of binary plugs from the
> >> product build and
> >> use these exported images for openjdk build.
> >> I think (but i am not 100% sure) that same procedure is used to export
> >> binary plug bits for people outside of @sun.com.
> >> So now there is fewer chance to have discrepancies (and after all
> >> t2k.lib is not needed anymore :) ).
> >>
> >>> But who knows?  Maybe we'll get lucky this time.  :-)
> >>>
> >> I can hardly wait to get feedback on build status.
> >> Hopefully this will be success report :)
> >>
> >>>> BTW, for windows build you will need to build freetype.dll (i tried
> >>>> only dll built with visualc). I believe that freetype build system
> >>>> does not generate .dll on windows and therefore some manual tweaking
> >>>> of freetype makefiles (and sources) might be necessary.
> >>>>
> >>> Sounds like fun! :-)  Will the documentation include a patch?  Or just
> >>> some tips on how to make a .DLL?  What source files needed to change?
> >>>
> >> No, there is no patch or detailed instruction in the openjdk docs.
> >>
> >> You can follow "official" freetype approach -
> >> http://freetype.freedesktop.org/wiki/FreeType_DLL.
> >> I believe it worked for me to prepare 32 bit binary.
> >> Perhaps someday they will finally simplify it and we can just run make
> :)
> >>
> >> In addition to described changes you may also want to tweak ftoptions.h
> >> to enable subpixel rendering.
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date:
> 8/2/2007
> >> 2:22 PM
> >>
> >>
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 8/2/2007
> > 2:22 PM
> >
> >
> >
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 8/2/2007
> 2:22 PM
> 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 8/2/2007
2:22 PM