T2K needed in Linux, also?

Mon Jul 30 00:06:07 UTC 2007

I don't think JDK engineers do "make clean" very much.
They either do "make clobber", or the crude yet effective

rm -rf ../build; make ...

Martin

Ted Neward wrote:
> Quick note: doing a "make clean" from the top yielded this:
> 
> $ make clean
> rm -f -r c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1/hotspot/outputdir
> rm -f -r c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1/hotspot/import
> ( cd  ../../j2se/make; make clobber EXTERNALSANITYCONTROL=true
> MILESTONE=private
>  BUILD_NUMBER=b00 JDK_BUILD_NUMBER=b00 FULL_VERSION=1.7.0-private-b00
> ALT_OUTPUT
> DIR=c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1
> ALT_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH=c:/Prg
> /OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1/hotspot/import BUILD_HOTSPOT=true
> BUILD_
> MOTIF=false ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32 ; )
> make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make'
> ../make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk:611: "WARNING: Value of
> HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PA
> TH cannot be empty, check or set ALT_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH"
> rm -f -r c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1
> rm: cannot remove directory `c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1':
> Dir
> ectory not empty
> make[1]: *** [clobber] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make'
> make: *** [j2se-clobber] Error 2
> CYGWIN:Ted at XPJAVA:/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/make
> $
> 
> Not sure if there was something in particular I needed to do to make the
> clean target work, but I "fixed" it by just nuking the build/* directories
> by hand. However, this doesn't exactly work, as apparently "make clean"
> *creates* directories underneath build (build/windows-i586, in particular)
> as part of cleaning the build. :-)
> 
> I suspect this to be a bug, yes?
> 
> Ted Neward
> Java, .NET, XML Services
> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> http://www.tedneward.com
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM]
>>Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 2:15 PM
>>To: Ted Neward
>>Cc: Phil.Race at Sun.COM; build-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>Subject: Re: T2K needed in Linux, also?
>>
>>The new sparse binary plugs will have the same exact layout as a jdk
>>install
>>tree, e.g. bin, lib, jre, jre/lib, jre/bin, etc.
>>With one additional directory called "libfiles". This is where t2k.lib
>>will be found,
>>however, look quickly, because it may be deleted from the binary plugs
>>soon
>>and won't even be needed anymore. So anything you do around t2k.lib may be
>>a bit
>>of a waste of time. The new sparse binary plugs are awaiting some legal
>>issues
>>and should be showing up any day now.
>>
>>The j2se/make/common/BinaryPlugs.gmk file has the rules for dealing with
>>the
>>binary plugs and has a rule that will copy the t2k.lib file into the right
>>place when the make/sun/font/Makefile is run. There is an export and
>>import
>>process for the BinaryPlugs. As the different engineering groups remove
>>the need for plugs, this file should get smaller and smaller, as will the
>>size of the binary plugs which will be created automatically soon.
>>
>>Unfortunately we suspect there is a missing 'mkdir' in BinaryPlugs.gmk
>>right
>>now:
>>
>>------- BinaryPlugs.gmk -------
>>*** /tmp/sccs.SHa4YR    Sat Jul 28 13:57:44 2007
>>--- BinaryPlugs.gmk     Sat Jul 28 13:57:37 2007
>>***************
>>*** 448,453 ****
>>--- 448,454 ----
>>   import-binary-plug-t2k-library: \
>>       $(LIBFILES_DIR)/t2k.lib $(LIB_LOCATION)/$(PLUG_T2K_LIBRARY)
>>         $(RM) $(OBJDIR)/t2k.lib
>>+       $(MKDIR) -p $(OBJDIR)
>>         $(CP) $(LIBFILES_DIR)/t2k.lib $(OBJDIR)
>>   else # !windows
>>   import-binary-plug-t2k-library: \
>>
>>At least that's what we think prevents the new sparse binary plug bundles
>>from allowing an OpenJDK build on windows to work right now.
>>We were testing windows builds last week just before I took off on a
>>short vacation.
>>You could simulate things by creating this "libfiles" directory and
>>placing
>>your t2k.lib file in it.
>>
>>As far as debugging the build process, it's not easy, but it has been
>>getting better over the last few releases.
>>Expect more build changes in the future with a goal of simplification.
>>
>>Try 'gnumake -p', or there was a recent article in Dr. Dobbs about
>>debugging
>>makefiles that was very helpful. Last month maybe or 2 months ago?
>>
>>-kto
>>
>>
>>Ted Neward wrote:
>>>Next issue: after an svn update (which caught me up to rev 244, the
>>latest
>>>in SVN), I do a Windows build, and it fails in the j2se/make/sun/font
>>build,
>>>trying (of course) to build t2k.lib. The problem is, I can't figure out
>>what
>>>it's looking for in order to slip t2k.lib into the right place and move
>>on.
>>>Here's the results:
>>>
>>>CYGWIN:Ted at XPJAVA:/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make/sun/font
>>>$ make
>>>/usr/bin/echo -e "lib=" ../../../build/windows-i586/bin/fontmanager.dll
>>>lib= ../../../build/windows-i586/bin/fontmanager.dll
>>>make -C t2k
>>>make[1]: Entering directory
>>>`/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make/sun/font/t2k'
>>>make[1]: *** No rule to make target
>>>`C:/Prg/OpenJDK/BinaryPlugs/jdk1.7.0/libfiles/t2k.lib', needed by
>>>`../../../../build/windows-i586/libfiles/t2k.lib'.  Stop.
>>>make[1]: Leaving directory
>>>`/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make/sun/font/t2k'
>>>make: *** [t2k] Error 2
>>>
>>>Where did this directory "libfiles" come from in the build step? My
>>guess is
>>>it's coming from a variable/setting somewhere, but I can't figure out
>>what
>>>to set in order to help the build system find my cribbed t2k.lib so it
>>can
>>>move on. And even if I create said directories (both in the BinaryPlugs
>>dir
>>>and the build dir), and put t2k.lib in there, the build still fails.
>>>
>>>Help?
>>>
>>>BTW, in general, how does one debug the build process? 'make -d' just
>>seems
>>>horrendous....
>>>
>>>Ted Neward
>>>Java, .NET, XML Services
>>>Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
>>>http://www.tedneward.com
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev-
>>>>bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Ted Neward
>>>>Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:10 AM
>>>>To: Phil.Race at Sun.COM
>>>>Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>>>Subject: RE: T2K needed in Linux, also?
>>>>
>>>>Yep, had it pointing to the Import JDK (1.6) instead of the binary plug
>>>>JDK
>>>>(1.7). Thanks. There's a lot of JDKs needed to build the JDK. :-)
>>>>
>>>>By the way, in case those on this list haven't seen it, the build on
>>Intel
>>>>machines won't work, as there's a compilation error in a source file,
>>as
>>>>reported on the hotspot-dev list on 7/9 by Sunil Soman. Patch:
>>>>
>>>>####
>>>>
>>>>--- src/cpu/i486/vm/assembler_i486.hpp.old  2007-07-09
>>>>10:29:14.412986944 -0700
>>>>+++ src/cpu/i486/vm/assembler_i486.hpp      2007-07-09
>>>>10:29:31.499389416 -0700
>>>>@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
>>>>
>>>>   // Easily misused constructor make them private  #ifndef _LP64
>>>>-  Address::Address(address loc, RelocationHolder spec);
>>>>+  Address(address loc, RelocationHolder spec);
>>>> #endif // _LP64
>>>>
>>>>  public:
>>>>
>>>>####
>>>>
>>>>Peter Kessler reported it as already reported, a la
>>>>
>>>>http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2007-July/000098.html
>>>>
>>>>but no official bug had been filed, and there was some concern about
>>>>Sunil's
>>>>contributor status or whatnot. Not sure what happened to it from there.
>>>>
>>>>Ted Neward
>>>>Java, .NET, XML Services
>>>>Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
>>>>http://www.tedneward.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: Phil.Race at Sun.COM [mailto:Phil.Race at Sun.COM]
>>>>>Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 5:52 AM
>>>>>To: Ted Neward
>>>>>Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>>>>Subject: Re: T2K needed in Linux, also?
>>>>>
>>>>>Ted Neward wrote:
>>>>>>When trying to build the JDK on a fresh KUbuntu 7.04 system, I get a
>>>>>>build error saying libt2k.so cannot be found. Am I missing something?
>>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, sounds like you are missing the entire binary plug download, or
>>>>>haven't properly pointed to it's location.
>>>>>
>>>>>-phil.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ted Neward
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Java, .NET, XML Services
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.tedneward.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.8/906 - Release Date:
>>>>>>7/17/2007 6:30 PM
>>>>>>
>>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.8/906 - Release Date:
>>>>7/17/2007
>>>>>6:30 PM
>>>>>
>>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.9/907 - Release Date:
>>7/18/2007
>>>>3:30 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.9/907 - Release Date:
>>7/18/2007
>>>>3:30 PM
>>>>
>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date:
>>7/24/2007
>>>1:50 PM
>>>
>>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.19/918 - Release Date: 7/25/2007
>>2:55 PM
>>
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.23/924 - Release Date: 7/28/2007
> 3:50 PM
>  
> 