[Fwd: Re: Alternative to "forests"]

Fri Apr 11 16:38:45 UTC 2008

I like it. Much more than forests which always seemed clunky to me.
I particularly like the fact that all modules would be listed in a file 
at the top level. Would make the writing of tools and scripts a lot 
easier and snappier.

Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> FYI...
>
> Interesting ideas on the use of forests or nested repositories.
>
> -kto
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Alternative to "forests"
> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:08:46 -0700
> From: Bryan O'Sullivan <bos at serpentine.com>
> To: Benjamin Smedberg <benjamin at smedbergs.us>
> CC: mercurial at selenic.com <mercurial at selenic.com>
> References: <47FE7654.7060508 at smedbergs.us>
>
> Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Please chew over this:
>
> http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/NestedRepositories
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial