getting a handle on build warnings

Jonathan Gibbons Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM
Thu Jul 10 17:20:51 UTC 2008


The point is noted, but it seems to me that it would be better to
work on removing warnings rather than making it even easier
to continue ignoring them :-)

With the possible exception of the obnoxious proprietary API
warnings from javac (which typically do not occur in the build
anyway), all warnings from javac  can be eliminated one way or
another, and we should be doing all we can to have developers
eliminate the warnings in the code for which they are responsible.
Even if we can't clean all the warnings from all the files, I think
it is reasonable to remove all the warnings from any file a
developer edits.

-- Jon

Martin Buchholz wrote:
> One significant simple annoyance is that compile errors are hard to find
> amongst the mass of warnings, because errors are not identified as such.
> It would be very nice if errors were prefixed by "error:" the same
> way that warnings are prefixed by "warning:",
> making them easy to search for.
>
> Martin
>   




More information about the build-dev mailing list