JDK_IMPORT_PATH

Kelly O'Hair Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM
Tue Mar 11 17:19:46 UTC 2008


A few days ago I putback this fix to the jdk7/build/corba repository:

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba/rev/a51017b6ba6d

Did you get that change?

Sorry about the problems. The corba Makefiles are considered somewhat
temporary, eventually the corba repository will become 100% java and
get built with an ant script much like jaxp and jaxws are built now.
At the time we separated out corba, it was the most difficult to
disconnect from the Makefiles and actually has a few native code pieces
that we hope to toss at some point, or move back into the jdk repository
to keep the native code corralled so to speak. ;^)

-kto

Douglas Felt wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
> 
> --- Kelly O'Hair <Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM> wrote:
> 
>> My apologies, I may have confused what the issue was here.
>> When building corba independently, you do need to point it at a
>> ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH so it can get a newer javac to use...
>>
>>
>> Perhaps this can help clarify...
>>
>> When we separated out the langtools, corba, jaxp, and jaxws repositories
>> the question comes up as to what "javac" should be used to compile
>> these sources. The langtools repository has the javac sources.
>> The BOOTDIR javac is one revision back (jdk6), so although it can
>> compile all this source now, it cannot create "jdk7" version classfiles
>> and would not be the same javac we would ship with this jdk7 release.
>> (Granted we are still only creating "jdk5" versioned classfiles in both
>>   jdk6 and jdk7, so ignore that issue for now, but we can't forget it.
>>   This refers to the -target 5 vs. -target 7 javac option.).
>>
>> So officially, every class file delivered as part of the jdk7 product
>> should have been compiled by "the" javac created by the latest jdk7
>> langtools javac.
>>
>> So the basic official steps for a master build are:
>>    Build langtools with the BOOTDIR jdk & javac (langtools team
>> guarantees
>>      that the langtools source can be built with a BOOTDIR jdk&javac).
>>      This creates a new javac tool that can run with a BOOTDIR jdk and
>>      also creates it's javac class files built with this new javac for
>>      inclusion into the final jdk7 image.
>>    Build everything else with this langtools javac and the BOOTDIR jdk.
>>
>> But when building any of these repositories independently, decisions
>> have to be made about what javac to use.
>> If ALT_LANGTOOLS_DIST is set to refer to a "dist" directory created
>> by a langtools build, then that javac and the BOOTDIR jdk is used to do
>> the
>> javac compiles (or should be, tell me if that is not true).
> 
> Apparently not.  I am building 'make all' from the root of the 2d image
> (as of last Saturday).  ALT_LANGTOOLS_DIST has been set, according to the
> sanity output, and the new javac etc all appear to be there.  The
> preceding steps went without error.
> 
> Setting ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH to be the same as ALT_BOOTDIR gets me past
> this for now, I'll see when the build finishes.
> 
> Doug
> 
>> Otherwise, it will use the ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH javac, which comes the
>> closest to the right javac to use. ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH should refer to
>> a fairly recent jdk7 image. Using the BOOTDIR jdk & javac seemed wrong
>> to me, but I could look into allowing it.
>>
>> Now, ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH doesn't "have to" refer to a jdk7 image,
>> you can probably get away with pointing it at a jdk6 image.
>> But that may not be a good long term answer, but should work now.
>>
>> The corba, jaxp, and jaxws teams may decide that their repositories
>> can be considered always buildable by the BOOTDIR jdk, in which case
>> we could change the rules to allow it to be built by the BOOTDIR jdk
>> if langtools javac is not available. But if they ever used a jdk7
>> feature in theor sources, they would not be able to use a BOOTDIR javac.
>>
>> Hope this helps... and hasn't created more confusion.... :^(
>>
>> -kto
>>
>>
>> Douglas Felt wrote:
>>> Kelly suggested the following, but it doesn't work for me.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> I think I pushed a fix for this into the jdk7/build/corba repository,
>>> but it may be a while before it gets integrated into the master
>>> jdk7/jdk7/corba repository.
>>>
>>> You could try:
>>>     cd your/corba
>>>     hg pull http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba
>>> ---
>>>
>>> dougfelt at df-kubuntu:~/openjdk/jdk7/java2d/corba$ hg pull
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba
>>> pulling from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba
>>> searching for changes
>>> no changes found
>>> $
>>> [...]
>>>>>> Recursively making xa build @ Fri Mar  7 00:39:59 PST 2008 ...
>>> make[3]: Entering directory
>>> `/home/dougfelt/openjdk/jdk7/java2d/corba/make/javax/xa'
>>> ../../common/shared/Defs-linux.gmk:138: "WARNING: Value of
>> JDK_IMPORT_PATH
>>> cannot be empty, check or set ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH"
>>>
>>> So I'm not sure what to do now.
>>>
>>> Doug
>>>
>>>
>>>      
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>>> Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
>>> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 
>> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
>>
> 
> 
> 
>       ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping



More information about the build-dev mailing list