FW: ATL headers and libraries?

Ted Neward ted at tedneward.com
Sat May 17 20:16:29 UTC 2008


This would also explain why I'm not finding any there, either. :-)

Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:15 AM
> To: Ted Neward
> Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: FW: ATL headers and libraries?
> 
> 
> Tim's email: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2007-
> December/000654.html
> 
> Mentions this:
>    hotspot\src\os\windows\vm\jvm_windows.h(33) : fatal error C1083:
> Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No such file
> or directory
> 
> 
> But windows.h should not be a problem to find, right? Platform SDK
> should
> have one I assume.
> 
> I seriously doubt that Hotspot would have any dependence on atlmfc.
> I searched and found no include's of any obvious atl files.
> 
> -kto
> 
> 
> Ted Neward wrote:
> > My understanding was that it did--there are a few build-dev emails
> about
> > missing "atlmfc.h" just a few weeks ago....
> >
> > But I haven't verified that from looking at the sources yet--been
> busy with
> > other things. I'll take a look and see. Can you check with the
> Hotspot team
> > if they know of any in the meantime (or, perhaps better yet, can you
> suggest
> > which list would be best to forward this email to)?
> >
> > Ted Neward
> > Java, .NET, XML Services
> > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> > http://www.tedneward.com
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:24 AM
> >> To: Ted Neward
> >> Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >> Subject: Re: FW: ATL headers and libraries?
> >>
> >> Does the hotspot sources have a ATL/MFC dependence?
> >>
> >> -kto
> >>
> >>
> >> Ted Neward wrote:
> >>> Kelly, et al—
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Should we just wait with the attempted port until this (see below)
> >>> happens? Or do we want to try and actively remove the dependencies
> on
> >>> ATL/MFC from the Hotspot code?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ted Neward
> >>>
> >>> Java, .NET, XML Services
> >>>
> >>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> >>>
> >>> http://www.tedneward.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* Herb Sutter [mailto:hsutter at microsoft.com]
> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:08 AM
> >>> *To:* Ted Neward
> >>> *Subject:* RE: ATL headers and libraries?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately, no, there is no way to get to ATL and/or MFC without
> >>> buying VS Std/Pro/etc. (of course, you can get those through your
> >> MSDN
> >>> subscription, etc.)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> For the future, though, the plan is to ship both ATL and MFC (x86,
> I
> >>> believe) in VC++ Express at some point.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Herb
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* Ted Neward [mailto:ted at tedneward.com]
> >>> *Sent:* Monday, May 12, 2008 12:23 PM
> >>> *To:* Herb Sutter
> >>> *Subject:* ATL headers and libraries?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can you tell me (or put me in touch with somebody who can) if it’s
> >>> possible to get a hold of the ATL and/or MFC headers and libraries
> >>> without buying Visual Studio Standard/Professional/Enterprise/etc?
> I
> >>> have a client who’s looking to see if they can use just VC++
> Express
> >> to
> >>> maintain some code that uses ATL and MFC.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ted Neward
> >>>
> >>> Java, .NET, XML Services
> >>>
> >>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> >>>
> >>> http://www.tedneward.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >>> Checked by AVG.
> >>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.15/1426 - Release Date:
> >>> 5/10/2008 11:12 AM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>> Checked by AVG.
> >>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.15/1426 - Release Date:
> >>> 5/10/2008 11:12 AM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >>> Checked by AVG.
> >>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1430 - Release Date:
> >>> 5/13/2008 7:31 AM
> >>>
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG.
> >> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1430 - Release Date:
> >> 5/13/2008 7:31 AM
> >>
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1434 - Release Date:
> 5/15/2008
> > 7:24 AM
> >
> >
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1434 - Release Date:
> 5/15/2008 7:24 AM
> 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1448 - Release Date: 5/16/2008
7:42 PM
 




More information about the build-dev mailing list