Round two Re: Please review fix for 6819847 [Re: [Fwd: Problems with building jmx for OpenJDK.]]

Joe Darcy Joe.Darcy at Sun.COM
Tue Mar 31 20:56:20 UTC 2009


Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/3/31 Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at sun.com>:
>> I wrote:
>>
>>> One question - if the user goes to the trouble to set any of
>>> ALT_BINARY_PLUGS_JARFILE, ALT_BINARY_PLUGS_PATH,
>>> ALT_BUILD_BINARY_PLUGS_PATH, ALT_CLOSED_JDK_IMPORT_PATH
>>> (See the comments in jdk/make/common/Defs.gmk starting at line 127),
>>> should we assume they must really, really want the binary plugs and force
>>> IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS=true?  Or have them set it as well?
>>
>>> I am thinking we shouldn't do this automatically.  I notice in the logs
>>> that JPRT is setting these even when IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS=false.
>> Review feedback convinced me to reverse that last statement.
>>
>> Here is round two - please take a look:
>>
>>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tbell/6819847/webrev.01/
>>
>> With these changes the default behavior is as if IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS=false
>>
>> Unless the user explicitly sets any of the PLUGS variables:
>>  ALT_BINARY_PLUGS_JARFILE, ALT_BINARY_PLUGS_PATH,
>>  ALT_BUILD_BINARY_PLUGS_PATH, ALT_CLOSED_JDK_IMPORT_PATH
>>
>> Setting these will force IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS=true
>>
>> The other case is if a user outside the Sun network sets
>> IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS=true.  Here they will need to set one of the
>> ALT_..._BINARY_PLUGS variables to point to the plugs anyway.
>>
> 
> That suggests to me that outside Sun, there is no need for
> IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS at all (i.e. its value is implied by the presence
> of one of the path variables).  However, I assume it is needed inside
> Sun, for whatever reason.

The only remaining need for the plugs in either OpenJDK 6 or 7 is for 
SNMP functionality.  If there was an open source replacement of that 
code, the plugs could go away altogether.

-Joe



More information about the build-dev mailing list