Request for review: Bug 100054: Make building the Nimbus look 'n' feel optional

[Kelly O'Hair]

Mark Reinhold wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 18:32:14 +0100
>> From: Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>
> 
[...snip...]
>>> (I can't resist pointing out that if you were using Mercurial patch
>>> Â queues you could just pop to that patch, edit, re-test, finalize,
>>> Â and then push the resulting changeset upstream.)
>> Yeah, but can webrev use patch queues yet? ;)
> 
> There are no mq-specific features in webrev, but since an mq-managed
> patch shows up as a regular changeset there's no reason you couldn't
> create a webrev comparing that changeset to some other one using the
> exicting capabilities of the webrev script.
> 

Try the webrev -N option, it will create a webrev of the edited working
set files against the current tip.

-kto