6856630: Restructure jaxp/jaxws repository

[Kelly O'Hair]

Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/11/4 Kelly O'Hair <Kelly.Ohair at sun.com>:
>>
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> 2009/11/4 Kelly O'Hair <Kelly.Ohair at sun.com>:
>>>> I'm basically ok with this, but have one concern.
>>>>
>>>> There is no longer a default ant value for drops.dir, it is only
>>>> set via the Makefile. Maybe that's ok, just not sure.
>>>> I think it means that a plain 'ant' command will always download
>>>> from the url. Again, maybe that's fine. So I'm ok with the push.
>>>>
>>> Ah I see what you mean.  I changed things so all the logic was in one
>>> place in the Makefile:
>>>
>>> ifdef ALT_DROPS_DIR
>>>  DROPS_DIR = $(ALT_DROPS_DIR)
>>> else
>>>  ifdef ALT_JDK_DEVTOOLS_DIR
>>>   DROPS_DIR = $(ALT_JDK_DEVTOOLS_DIR)/share/jdk7-drops
>>>  else
>>>   DROPS_DIR = $(_SLASHJAVA)/devtools/share/jdk7-drops
>>>  endif
>>> endif
>>>
>>> so you get the same behaviour as before, but as you say, only when
>>> running ant via the makefile.
>>> Is ant ever run directly in this situation? I've never had reason to do
>>> so.
>> I do manually, and if you build via the NetBeans project. But the url
>> usage should work.
>>
>>> Either way, I can add an updated version back to the build.xml.
>>> That's not a problem, as we'll never use it.
>>>
>>> Can you allocate a bug ID so I can push? :)
>> 6898251: Add ALT_DROPS_DIR feature to jaxp/jaxws
>>
>>
>> -kto
>>
>>>> I've learned to keep ant scripts out of the environment variable
>>>> business if at all possible, so leaving any env var logic in
>>>> the makefiles may be fine.
>>>>
>>>> Keeping the ant<->make boundaries simple seems like an essential
>>>> thing to do, sigh, but is anything "simple" with ant scripts or
>>>> Makefiles... :^(
>>>>
>>> I know what you mean all too well... :(
>>> At one point, I managed to have three different JDKs, all from
>>> different vendors, involved in the building of langtools...
>>>
>>>> -kto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>> 2009/10/28 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>> snip..
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well spotted; revised version here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/drops/webrev.03/
>>>>> Does this look ok to push?
>>> Thanks,
> 
> You've probably mentioned this before, but to which tree? I have it
> applied to tl here for some reason I can't now remember...

You will need to use the jdk7/tl forest.

The jdk7/build forest doesn't have the jdk7/tl jaxp/jaxws changes yet.

-kto