Fwd: Re: Need reviewer: Boot jdk needs to be 1.6, minor fixes to javadoc generation
Jonathan Gibbons
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Mon Aug 2 23:17:01 UTC 2010
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Need reviewer: Boot jdk needs to be 1.6, minor fixes to
javadoc generation
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 19:15:50 -0400
From: John Yeary <johnyeary at gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Gibbons <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>
Looks good to me.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
<jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com <mailto:jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>> wrote:
Looks good to me.
-- Jon
On 08/02/2010 03:40 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Need reviewer: Boot jdk needs to be 1.6, minor fixes to javadoc
generation
6973616: Update minimum boot jdk from 1.5 to 1.6
6971426: jdk/make/docs docs target does not work on windows
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-6971426%2b6973616/webrev/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eohair/openjdk7/jdk7-6971426%2b6973616/webrev/>
The boot jdk really needs to be at least 1.6 for jdk7.
The jdk/make/docs/Makefile was recently re-worked but it wasn't
very forgiving during partial
builds where some of the directories might not exist, or when
unrelated platform specific directories
were purposely not included during the build.
Note that even though the javadocs can be built on windows
machines now, developers might want
refrain from actually doing it on windows due to the build time
hit and the fact that it is still not a
complete documentation set when generated on windows (jvmti.html
is not generated on windows).
-kto
--
John Yeary
--
http://javaevangelist.blogspot.com
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even
though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits
who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray
twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."
-- Theodore Roosevelt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20100802/cbabbc6a/attachment.htm>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list