Need reviewer: ant 1.7.1 or newer needed

[Rinaldo DiGiorgio]

On Feb 8, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:

> 
> I take that back. Welcome rinaldo to the OpenJDK commit list!
> I will put you down as a reviewer. I didn't think you had the OpenJDK ID yet.
Thanks -- never expected to be here from initial position I came in on. Just received it
this morning. I hope I never put back to the wrong repository. :) Mark R has a new process 
and alias for getting access, once you send to it you get an invitation to join.
 Response was very fast and you get a nice form to  fill out.

Rinaldo

> 
> -kto
> 
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> 
>> I did not know that an ant 1.7.3 even existed.
>> 
>> Thanks for the review. But I still need a second reviewer.
>> 
>> -kto
>> 
>> On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Rinaldo DiGiorgio wrote:
>> 
>>> Looks good to me.  It also worked with 1.7.3
>>> 
>>> On Feb 8, 2011, at 7:00 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Need reviewer: ant 1.7.1 or newer needed
>>>> 
>>>> This changes the minimum required ant version to 1.7.1 and also makes it a fatal sanity error
>>>> to try and use anything older.
>>>> The ant 1.7.1 release was done in July 2008 and is a well known stable ant release.
>>>> 
>>>> 7016976: Documentation for required ant version  on JDK7 builds on Solaris 10 and Solaris 11
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-build-ant171/webrev/
>>>> 
>>>> -kto
>>>> 
>>>> P.S. Ant binary bundles can be found at http://archive.apache.org/dist/ant/binaries/
>>> 
>> 
>