build failure on solaris-sparc
Weijun Wang
weijun.wang at oracle.com
Wed Sep 14 14:08:59 UTC 2011
I've filed a bug in solaris: xserver/libx11:
http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsf?cr=7090509
7090509 OpenJDK build failure on snv_173
-Max
On 09/14/2011 08:57 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> We came across a similar issue with SCTP a few months back, see CR
> 7051922 and CR 7051489.
>
> The Solaris guys fixed the header so that it did not use C99 features
> unless __C99FEATURES__ is defined.
>
> -Chris.
>
> On 14/09/2011 12:25, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> The machine is a snv_173 and its /usr/include/X11/Xfuncproto.h is much
>> longer than an old version, say, the one on sc11b1903, which is a JPRT
>> machine with 5.10.
>>
>> Here are the lines that causes the problem:
>>
>> 132 /* requires xproto >= 7.0.22 */
>> 133 #if defined(__GNUC__) && ((__GNUC__ * 100 + __GNUC_MINOR__) >= 303)
>> 134 #define _X_NONNULL(args...) __attribute__((nonnull(args)))
>> 135 #else
>> 136 #define _X_NONNULL(...) /* */
>> 137 #endif
>>
>> So I write a tiny a.c and you can see:
>>
>> $ cat a.c
>> #define A(...)
>> int main() {}
>>
>> $ /java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u1/bin/cc a.c
>> $ /java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u1/bin/cc -xc99=%none a.c
>> "a.c", line 1: invalid token in #define macro parameters: ...
>> cc: acomp failed for a.c
>>
>> -Max
>>
>>
>> On 09/14/2011 06:56 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> Is it possible that one of the system includes in using C99 features? It
>>> may be that on older Solaris boxes have an older version of the include
>>> file?
>>>
>>> -Chris.
>>>
>>> On 14/09/2011 11:49, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>>> I'm building jdk8 on a solaris-sparc and see this failure:
>>>>
>>>> /java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u1/bin/cc -xO2 -Wc,-Qrm-s
>>>> -Wc,-Qiselect-T0 -L../../../build/solaris-sparc/tmp/sun/sun.awt/awt/obj
>>>> -xc99=%none -xCC -errshort=tags -Xa -xregs=no%appl -xmemalign=4s -v -mt
>>>> -xstrconst -W0,-noglobal -m32 -xarch=sparcvis -KPIC
>>>> -D__MEDIALIB_OLD_NAMES -D__USE_J2D_NAMES -DMLIB_ADD_SUFF
>>>> ../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/medialib/vis_32.il
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/medialib
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/medialib
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/java2d/loops -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED
>>>> -D__solaris__ -Dsparc -DTRACING -DMACRO_MEMSYS_OPS -DBREAKPTS -I.
>>>> -I../../../build/solaris-sparc/tmp/sun/sun.awt/awt/CClassHeaders
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/javavm/export -I../../../src/share/javavm/export
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/common -I../../../src/solaris/native/common
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/debug
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/../font
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/../font
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/image
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/image/cvutils
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/shell
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/medialib
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/medialib
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/../java2d
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/../java2d
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/../java2d/loops
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/../java2d/pipe
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/../java2d/opengl
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/../java2d/opengl
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/../java2d/x11
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/../dc/doe
>>>> -I../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/../dc/path
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/../jdga
>>>> -I../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt -c -o
>>>> ../../../build/solaris-sparc/tmp/sun/sun.awt/awt/obj/BufImgSurfaceData.o
>>>>
>>>> ../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/image/BufImgSurfaceData.c
>>>> "/usr/include/X11/Xfuncproto.h", line 136: invalid token in #define
>>>> macro parameters: ...
>>>> cc: acomp failed for
>>>> ../../../src/share/native/sun/awt/image/BufImgSurfaceData.c
>>>>
>>>> Googling "invalid token in #define macro parameters: ..." shows
>>>> something about c99 so I remove the -xc99=%none option above and re-run
>>>> the command and it succeeds. Is there really a connection here?
>>>>
>>>> The machine is pae-t4two-04.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Max
More information about the build-dev
mailing list