Review Request: Build-infra M1

[Jonathan Gibbons]

In langtools/Makefile,

line 42, bad/inappropriate/editorial comment:
"A more palatable solution would be to add the GenStubs functionality to 
javac."
It would be totally unacceptable to add GenStubs to javac, so the 
comment is irrelevant.

line 120, 130-138, the nio files are not required when building on JDK 7.

line 179, what is "javax.tools.JavaCompilerTool" and why is it listed as 
in RESOURCE_SUFFIXES
line 194, is the JARMAIN required? It should not be used downstream, so 
does it need to be set here?

-- Jon



On 04/04/2012 07:41 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> One final review update. Cleanup of configure help output and make 
> help target in root repo.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-root-new.03/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eerikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-root-new.03/>
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2012-04-03 11:59, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Fixed these comments and posted new webrevs:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-corba-new.02/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eerikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-corba-new.02/>
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-langtools-new.02/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eerikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-langtools-new.02/>
>>
>> (Tried making a single webrev but my forest extension isn't working 
>> that well)
>>
>> /Erik
>>
>> On 2012-03-30 20:08, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> Corba Makefile says:  45 # Thus we force the target bytecode to 6.
>>> But I think 6 should be 7, or better yet "...the
>>> boot
>>>
>>> jdk target bytecode."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Everything else looks ok to
>>> me.
>>>
>>> -kto
>>>
>>>
>>
>> On 2012-03-30 15:19, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>>> langtools makefile...
>>>
>>> line 55 typo in comment "ony"
>>>
>>> line 57 grammar in comment "list of to be created"
>>>
>>> The Swedish examples are somewhat silly since there are no swedish 
>>> properties files.
>>>
>>> The comments on line 92--94 are inaccurate: javac is only build 
>>> twice, not three times.
>>>
>>> line 130: grammar, should be either "strip them of all content" or 
>>> "strip all content from them"
>>>
>>> line 168: not clear what "this setup" refers to.
>>>
>>> -- Jon
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20120404/1d768d67/attachment.htm>