webrev failure?

[David Holmes]

Reverting to 2.2.1 seems to have fixed things for me.

But I tend not to use the -f option with webrev anyway.

David

On 13/08/2012 7:49 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 12/08/2012 9:39 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
>> (I'm 2.3 at the moment).
>
> Unfortunately no. I just hit this myself with 2.3:
>
>  > hg --version
> *** failed to import extension hgext.forest from ~/hg/forest.py:
> 'module' object has no attribute 'wirerepository'
> Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 2.3)
>
> but I don't know what version I had previously been using.
>
> David
> -----
>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 12 August 2012 12:29, David Holmes<david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> I had thought that webrev only tried to operate on a forest if you
>>> asked it
>>> to - and that that requires the forest extension.
>>>
>>> That said the forest extension is not working with recent mercurial
>>> versions. :(
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/08/2012 2:04 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Apologies if these are the wrong mailing lists, but I'm assuming that
>>>> the webrev tool falls under this domain somewhat.
>>>>
>>>> In order to get patches into the OpenJDK as cleanly as possible, we're
>>>> looking to utilise webrev (since it's the std and all).
>>>>
>>>> Running "ksh ./make/scripts/webrev.ksh -f" over the latest jdk8/tl
>>>> source (no patches, but a full build was completed using build-infra)
>>>> and I got a host of errors:
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>>
>>>> SCM detected: mercurial
>>>> hg: unknown command 'foutgoing'
>>>> abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: "Mercurial"
>>>> abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: "basic"
>>>> abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: "add"
>>>> abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: "annotate"
>>>> ..
>>>> ..
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>>
>>>> A separate, yet related set of errors are at
>>>> http://pastebin.com/q0tF1A4m for sake of brevity in this mail.
>>>>
>>>> I assume I'm running this tool incorrectly, I expected a result of
>>>> something like "You've changed nothing, nothing to se here move along
>>>> please" :-)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martijn