Fwd: Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build") an option that can be disabled

[Jonathan Gibbons]

I think it would be good to see a more general proposal for how
to handle tests in this new world, and then to see this Queens test
be a part of that design.

-- Jon


On 05/15/2012 04:34 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I should probably have posted this here as well...
>
> There is a newer webrev than the one below at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/make-test-in-build-an-option/webrev.01/
>
> This adds:
>  * Skip building test_gamma if TEST_IN_BUILD is not enabled
>  * If cross-compiling, set TEST_IN_BUILD to false instead of making an 
> early exit in test_gamma.
>
> /Magnus
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build") 
> an option that can be disabled
> Date: 	Mon, 14 May 2012 15:05:10 +0200
> From: 	Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com>
> To: 	hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
>
>
>
> As part of the new build system created in the build-infra project, we
> want to make it a configurable option wether or not to run the Queens
> test as part of the build.
>
> Here is a patch that introduces a new make variable, TEST_IN_BUILD,
> which controls wether to run the Queens test (test_gamma.sh) or not. If
> the variable is not explicitely set, it will default to true, mening
> that the default behaviour will be as before, that is, to run the Queens
> test. However, if you (or configure) explicitely set it to false, the
> Queens test will be skipped.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/make-test-in-build-an-option/webrev.00
>
> /Magnus
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20120515/a7c9f726/attachment.htm>