Review Request: 8003844: build-infra: docs target isn't working properly

[Jonathan Gibbons]

OK, as long as you're picking up the right bits, the packaging details 
do not matter quite so much, since these jars are only used temporarily 
during the build process.

-- Jon

On 11/26/2012 08:25 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Yes, and the bootstrap jar for javadoc does actually contain all of 
> it. The only difference between bootstrap javac.jar and bootstrap 
> javadoc.jar is the manifest. I'm not sure this is a good idea, but 
> it's the way it currently works in build-infra.
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2012-11-26 17:16, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> The changes to common/makefiles/javadoc/Javadoc.gmk look suspect.
>> One way or another, you need all of the classes from javadoc, javac
>> and doclets on the bootclasspath.
>>
>> -- Jon
>>
>> On 11/26/2012 08:10 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> Looks good to me.
>>>
>>> -kto
>>>
>>> On Nov 26, 2012, at 3:01 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have fixed the docs target and added support for comparing the 
>>>> generated docs with the old build.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8003844/webrev.01/
>>>>
>>>> /Erik
>>