Review Request: 8005347: build-infra: Verify 'gnumake source' at the top level works ok

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Jan 1 22:58:53 UTC 2013


Not sure of how all the bits click together between open and closed but 
on the surface this looks okay.

One nit. The old version number file had a copyright

Copyright (c) 2012,

yet somehow the new one became

Copyright (c) 2011, 2012,

??

Really I think it should now be:

Copyright (c) 2012, 2013,

Cheers,
David
-----

On 2/01/2013 12:39 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> New webrev. I decided that David was right, it really should be in
> closed so I moved it there, along with the closed version numbers file
> and the reading of it. These files are also changing names slightly to
> avoid the .numbers extension which is just weird.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8005347/webrev.root.02/
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2012-12-31 11:01, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> No, they are not. I hesitated as to if I should move it all to closed,
>> but opted not to at this point, to save time more than anything. Ok if
>> I open a bug on moving it to fix it later?
>>
>> /Erik
>>
>> On 2012-12-30 23:45, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Erik,
>>>
>>> On 30/12/2012 11:51 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>> Open part of this review. Configure needs to supply a couple of more
>>>> utilities and version string variations.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8005347/webrev.root.01/
>>>
>>> Those new variables do not seem relevant to openjdk builds. Is any of
>>> this "gnumake source" relevant to openjdk builds ??
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>> /Erik



More information about the build-dev mailing list