RFR(S): JDK-8026964 Building with an IBM J9 boot jdk requires special settings for BOOT_RTJAR
Volker Simonis
volker.simonis at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 21:33:27 UTC 2013
Hi Magnus,
is the msys build currently working (i.e. can I test it out of the box)?
I think otherwise it would be hard to get this right for msys (it took me
quite some time to get it right on Cygwin, so without a full
sucessfull build I wouldn't bet on it:)
I agree that we shouldnt unnecessarily break the msys build. Actually, I
contributed the first msys changes for jdk7:) I'll try to find a solution
which works on both systems...
Volker
On Monday, November 18, 2013, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> This will still not work on msys.
>
> While it would be an improvement to check for OPENJDK_TARGET_OS_ENV =
> windows.cygwin instead (or similar, I don't have source code access at the
> moment), this would still leave msys out in the cold. I think it's a bit
> unfortunate to cause msys to break even further.
>
> I have no easy suggestion on how to fix this in msys however, so an
> AC_MSG_ERROR for windows.msys might be better than nothing. Then at least
> the missing implementation becomes visible.
>
> You can push multi-repo fixes with a single bug number. I do that all the
> time.
>
> If your stage forest does not have a closed counterpart (which I doubt),
> then you can push this yourself. An autoconf update will be needed when the
> stage forest is integrated into a forest which has a closed counterpart,
> but only then, and that is the work of the person doing the integration.
>
> /Magnus
>
> > 18 nov 2013 kl. 17:34 skrev Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com<javascript:;>
> >:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here's a new version of the webrev:
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8026964.v2/
> >
> > I now use '-XshowSettings:properties' as suggested by Kumar, but not
> > '-version'. This is because '-XshowSettings' didn't work together with
> > '-version' before 7u6 (see "7123582 : (launcher) display the -version
> > and -XshowSettings",
> > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7123582).
> >
> > I know that the official build README mentions 7u7 as the minimum boot
> > JDK but as this change is also about non OpenJDK/Oracle boot JDKs I
> > prefer to be conservative here (and actually the few more lines that
> > must be parsed by AWK don't really make a difference here).
> >
> > I've also did yet another small change for the Windows case: I convert
> > the content of sun.boot.class.path to Unix form, but with Windows path
> > separators. This is required by the FIXPATH utility which will convert
> > it back to the Windows form later on during the build process.
> >
> > And unfortunately this change also requires another tiny change in
> > jdk/makefiles/Setup.gmk - and all just to make the Windows build
> > happy:( We now have to quote BOOT_RTJAR with double quotes in
> > jdk/makefiles/Setup.gmk (as this is already done for the Corba make)
> > because it is a path list now and not just a single file:
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8026964.jdk/
> >
> > I think we must push the jdk-change first, because it will do no harm
> > with the current BOOT_RTJAR settings. Afterwards, we can safely push
> > the configure change in the root repository. I'm only not sure if I
> > need a new Bug-ID for the JDK change because there have been different
> > statements regarding such multi-repo changes in the past.
> >
> > And I suppose I can't push these changes myself even to stage, because
> > they require the re-generation of the closed auto-generated config
> > script. So I need your help...
> >
> > Thank you and best regards,
> > Volker
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Kumar Srinivasan
> > <kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Volker,
> >>
> >> One thing I notieced,
> >>
> >> BOOT_RTJAR=`$BOOT_JDK/bin/java -XshowSettings 2>&1 .......
> >>
> >> I suggest using java -XshowSettings:props -version 2>&1 .........
> >>
> >> props, will narrow down the reporting to only properties section,
> which is
> >> really what you want
> >>
> >> -version, will allow the launcher to return a 0 exit value, since
> >> -XshowSettings
> >> behaves like -showversion ie. another class or option is expected for
> the
> >> launcher
> >> to continue.
> >>
> >> Kumar
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> could you please review the following small webrev:
> >>>
> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8026964/
> >>>
> >>> It not only fixes bug 8026964 on AIX, but is changes the general way
> >>> of how to compute BOOT_RTJAR.
> >>>
> >>> With the new solution, BOOT_RTJAR is computed right from the system
> >>> property 'sun.boot.class.path'. The new solution should be more robust
> >>> and more portable as it doesn't depend on the name of the jar file
> >>> which contains the boot classes and it also doesn't depend on the fact
> >>> that all these classes are located in a single jar file.
> >>>
> >>> In order to avoid build warnings, I've taken extra care to remove jar
> >>> files and paths from the 'sun.boot.class.path' output which do not
> >>> exist (e.g. jfr.jar is not available in an OpenJDK build but appears
> >>> in 'sun.boot.class.path' anyway - maybe this is another bug that
> >>> should be fixed; also jre/classes appears in 'sun.boot.class.path'
> >>> although it is not present in the file system - maybe we should fix
> >>> that as well).
> >>>
>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list