RFR(XXS): 8066766: The commands in the modular images are executable by the owner only
Chris Hegarty
chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Fri Dec 5 18:43:03 UTC 2014
On 5 Dec 2014, at 18:14, Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Volker,
>>
>> Personally I would use the more verbose version, Files.setPosixFilePermissions, so we can see any failures. But as Alan pointed out, this is a temporary build tool, and I live with it either way. Is there any reason why you cannot use the NIO API ?
>
> No, for me it's no problem. I was just wondering if
> Files.setPosixFilePermissions() would work on Windows. Because now it
> is only used for the 'jspawnhelper' which is not built on Windows. If
> Files.setPosixFilePermissions() doesn't throw an exception on Windows
> I'll be happy to use that version for the binaries as well.
OK thanks. You are saving us from ourselves! Please go with your 2nd webrev.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8066766.v2/
-Chris.
>> -Chris.
>>
>> On 5 Dec 2014, at 16:50, Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> thanks for the fast response.
>>>
>>> I saw that code in ImageBuilder, but it looked overly complicated to
>>> me. What about cleaning that up as well:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8066766.v2/
>>>
>>> I've just checked that on Solaris 'jspawnhelper' still has the right
>>> execution bits set after the change.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Volker
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Volker,
>>>>
>>>> I agree with your change, or you can take the code from ImageBuilder. Either
>>>> is fine with me.
>>>>
>>>> private void setExecutable(Path file) {
>>>> try {
>>>> Set<PosixFilePermission> perms =
>>>> Files.getPosixFilePermissions(file);
>>>> perms.add(PosixFilePermission.OWNER_EXECUTE);
>>>> perms.add(PosixFilePermission.GROUP_EXECUTE);
>>>> perms.add(PosixFilePermission.OTHERS_EXECUTE);
>>>> Files.setPosixFilePermissions(file, perms);
>>>> } catch (IOException ioe) {
>>>> throw new UncheckedIOException(ioe);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -Chris.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/12/14 14:07, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> after the integration of the modular changes into jdk9-dev the
>>>>> executable commands in jdk/bin and jre/bin images are only executable
>>>>> by the file owner. This means that only the user who built the images
>>>>> can execute the programs.
>>>>>
>>>>> This can be easily fixed with the following trivial change:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8066766/
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066766
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Volker
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list