RFR(S) Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix for 8033602 and 8034005

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

Thanks! I was still in need of a (R)eviewer and a Runtime
team member so thanks for covering both...

Dan


On 11/12/14 8:10 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> If you still need a Reviewer, looks okay to me.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 11/11/2014 10:00 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I have a Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix ready for review.
>> Yes, it is a small fix, but it is in Makefiles so feel free to
>> run screaming from the room... :-)  On the plus side the fix does
>> delete two work around source files (Coleen would say that's a
>> Good Thing (TM)!)
>>
>> The fix is to detect the version of GNU objcopy that is being
>> used on the machine and only enable Full Debug Symbols when that
>> version is 2.21.1 or newer. If you don't have the right version,
>> then the build drops back to pre-FDS build configs with a message
>> like this:
>>
>> WARNING: /usr/sfw/bin/gobjcopy --version info:
>> WARNING: GNU objcopy 2.15
>> WARNING: an objcopy version of 2.21.1 or newer is needed to create valid
>> .debuginfo files.
>> WARNING: ignoring above objcopy command.
>> WARNING: patch 149063-01 or newer contains the correct Solaris 10 SPARC
>> version.
>> WARNING: patch 149064-01 or newer contains the correct Solaris 10 X86
>> version.
>> WARNING: Solaris 11 Update 1 contains the correct version.
>> INFO: no objcopy cmd found so cannot create .debuginfo files.
>> INFO: ENABLE_FULL_DEBUG_SYMBOLS=0
>>
>> This work is being tracked by the following bug IDs:
>>
>>      JDK-8033602 wrong stabs data in libjvm.debuginfo on JDK 8 - SPARC
>>      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033602
>>
>>      JDK-8034005 cannot debug in synchronizer.o or objectMonitor.o on
>> Solaris X86
>>      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034005
>>
>> Here is the webrev URL:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8033602-webrev/0-jdk9-hs-rt/
>>
>> Testing:
>>
>> - JPRT test jobs to verify that the current JPRT Solaris hosts
>>    are happy
>> - local builds on my Solaris 10 X86 machine to verify that the
>>    wrong version of GNU objcopy is caught
>>
>> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.
>>
>> Dan