RFR: AARCH64: 8064357: Top-level JDK changes

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Fri Nov 21 16:01:50 UTC 2014


On 11/21/2014 03:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> 
> Almost there! :-)
> 
> 1) Comment in config.sub identifies it as config.guess.
> 
> 2) As as understand it, your first attempt is to just dispatch through 
> to autoconf-config.sub if there is no aarch64 arguments. Good! However, 
> the code could be made clearer: The dot is small and some comment 
> clarifying that we will exit after this line might be helpful to the 
> reader.

I could just add

exit $?

after the call to autoconf-config.sub.  That way it does not matter
whether autoconf-config.sub exits or not, and the reader can tell
that we don't go any further.

> Also, you're using a $sub_args which is not defined. This will 
> not break, but it makes the reader confused. (I suspect copy/paste glitch.)

Oh, bah.  Right you are.

> 3) The webrev indicates that the original config.sub was renamed to 
> config.sub.orig, instead of autoconf-config.sub.

How strange.  I'll fix that.

> But since that is how 
> it is called in the new config.sub wrapper, the patch is unlikely to 
> work. When you test this, make sure you have no lingering files in your 
> workspace that can mess up the results. (e.g. no "?" files in hg status).

OK.

Andrew.





More information about the build-dev mailing list