[PATCH] Fix Shark build in JDK9

[Erik Joelsson]

Hello Roman,

This addition looks good to me.

Thinking about what the others said, it might be inconvenient to have 
all this be pushed to different forests. I tried applying all the 
changes to jdk9/hs-rt, but I can't seem to build zeroshark.. Did you 
have more hotspot changes to be able to finish the build?

My failure is:

  ciTypeFlow.o 
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/ci/ciTypeFlow.cpp
In file included from 
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/regmask.hpp:29:0,
                  from 
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/compile.hpp:40,
                  from 
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/ci/ciTypeFlow.cpp:38:
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/optoreg.hpp:40:39: 
fatal error: adfiles/adGlobals_zero.hpp: No such file or directory

 From what I can see, adfiles are not generated for zero or zeroshark 
builds, so the include should probably be removed.

Would you still like me to push what you currently have to hs-rt?

/Erik

On 2015-01-07 21:21, Roman Kennke wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> When I built Zero and Shark on my Raspberry Pi, I noticed another
> problem when copying jvm.cfg into the right places. I fixed it in a
> similar way as I did for the SA stuff:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-jdk/webrev.02/
>
> I think that should be all for now.
>
> Please push that into JDK9 if you think that's fine.
>
> Best regards,
> Roman
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:49 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
>> On 2015-01-07 17:29, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>> Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:16 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
>>>> On 2015-01-07 17:11, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>>>> Hi Erik,
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have a bug for this?
>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't pushed any changes to JDK in a while. Is it possible in the
>>>>> meantime for me to create my own bugs? Otherwise, please file one for
>>>>> me :-)
>>>> You should be able to log in to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net and create
>>>> bugs since you have an OpenJDK identity.
>>> Done:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068598
>>>
>>> While I'm at it, is it possible for me to push my own changes (except
>>> hotspot of course)? If yes, what needs to be done for regenerating the
>>> configure files? Simply run autogen.sh in common/autoconf with whatever
>>> version of autotools I have? Or doesn't it make sense at all b/c you
>>> need to regenerate your closed scripts?
>> It requires you to run common/autogen.sh yes, and that will require you
>> to have autoconf 2.69 installed. But since we also need to regenerate
>> the closed version, I can take care of the push for you. Will do it
>> tomorrow if that's ok?
>>
>> /Erik
>>> Roman
>>>
>