[PATCH] Fix Shark build in JDK9

[David Holmes]

On 8/01/2015 9:05 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> Oh and notice that if you try to build it yourself, use a version of
> LLVM < 3.5. In 3.5, C++11 is used/required, and OpenJDK doesn't support
> C++11 yet. (are there any plans about this?) I'd recommend LLVM 3.4.2.

C++11? We still have workarounds for compilers that don't support C99 :(

David

> Roman
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.01.2015 um 11:03 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
>> Hello Roman,
>>
>> This addition looks good to me.
>>
>> Thinking about what the others said, it might be inconvenient to have
>> all this be pushed to different forests. I tried applying all the
>> changes to jdk9/hs-rt, but I can't seem to build zeroshark.. Did you
>> have more hotspot changes to be able to finish the build?
>>
>> My failure is:
>>
>>    ciTypeFlow.o
>> /localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/ci/ciTypeFlow.cpp
>> In file included from
>> /localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/regmask.hpp:29:0,
>>                    from
>> /localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/compile.hpp:40,
>>                    from
>> /localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/ci/ciTypeFlow.cpp:38:
>> /localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/optoreg.hpp:40:39:
>> fatal error: adfiles/adGlobals_zero.hpp: No such file or directory
>>
>>   From what I can see, adfiles are not generated for zero or zeroshark
>> builds, so the include should probably be removed.
>>
>> Would you still like me to push what you currently have to hs-rt?
>>
>> /Erik
>>
>> On 2015-01-07 21:21, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>> Hi Erik,
>>>
>>> When I built Zero and Shark on my Raspberry Pi, I noticed another
>>> problem when copying jvm.cfg into the right places. I fixed it in a
>>> similar way as I did for the SA stuff:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-jdk/webrev.02/
>>>
>>> I think that should be all for now.
>>>
>>> Please push that into JDK9 if you think that's fine.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Roman
>>>
>>> Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:49 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
>>>> On 2015-01-07 17:29, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>>>> Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:16 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
>>>>>> On 2015-01-07 17:11, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Erik,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have a bug for this?
>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't pushed any changes to JDK in a while. Is it possible in the
>>>>>>> meantime for me to create my own bugs? Otherwise, please file one for
>>>>>>> me :-)
>>>>>> You should be able to log in to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net and create
>>>>>> bugs since you have an OpenJDK identity.
>>>>> Done:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068598
>>>>>
>>>>> While I'm at it, is it possible for me to push my own changes (except
>>>>> hotspot of course)? If yes, what needs to be done for regenerating the
>>>>> configure files? Simply run autogen.sh in common/autoconf with whatever
>>>>> version of autotools I have? Or doesn't it make sense at all b/c you
>>>>> need to regenerate your closed scripts?
>>>> It requires you to run common/autogen.sh yes, and that will require you
>>>> to have autoconf 2.69 installed. But since we also need to regenerate
>>>> the closed version, I can take care of the push for you. Will do it
>>>> tomorrow if that's ok?
>>>>
>>>> /Erik
>>>>> Roman
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>